The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social impact assessment: the state of the art
Open accessAbstract
Social impact assessment (SIA) is now conceived as being the process of managing the social issues of development. There is consensus on what ‘good’ SIA practice is – it is participatory; it supports affected peoples, proponents and regulatory agencies; it increases understanding of change and capacities to respond to change; it seeks to avoid and mitigate negative impacts and to enhance positive benefits across the life cycle of developments; and it emphasizes enhancing the lives of vulnerable and disadvantaged people. We analyse the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats facing SIA. We assert that the SIA community needs to revisit core concepts, such as culture, community, power, human rights, gender, justice, place, resilience and sustainable livelihoods. It is incumbent on SIA practitioners to educate proponents, regulators and colleagues about these concepts, and to embed them into practice norms. Stronger engagement with the emerging trends of free, prior and informed consent (FPIC); human rights impact assessment; social performance standards; supply chain management; governance; local content and economic development will improve the relevance and demonstrable value of SIA to all stakeholders.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Layder, D. (1998) · doi:10.4135/9781849209946 · Cited by 585
Cited by
Re-Thinking Mining Waste through an Integrative Approach Led by Circular Economy Aspirations
Tayebi-Khorami, M., Edraki, M., Corder, G., & Golev, A. (2019) · Minerals · doi:10.3390/min9050286 · Cited by 322
(2021) · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/abd78c · Cited by 251
Human rights and impact assessment: clarifying the connections in practice
Kemp, D., & Vanclay, F. (2013) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2013.782978 · Cited by 195
Self-citationAlgorithmic Impact Assessments and Accountability: The Co-construction of Impacts
Metcalf, J., Moss, E., Watkins, E. A., Singh, R., & Elish, M. C. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445935 · Cited by 195
Information privacy, impact assessment, and the place of ethics
Raab, C. D. (2020) · Computer Law & Security Review · doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105404 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F.
- Venue
- Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2012-03
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 34-42
- ISSN
- 1461-5517 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5465
- OpenAlex
- W2008982893
- Cited by
- 693
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 118.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social impact assessment: the state of the art. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
- The paper
- Esteves, A. M., Franks, D., & Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.660356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.