Cited by 92Urban Heat Island MitigationBuilding Energy and Comfort OptimizationClimate Change and Health Impacts

Thermal range of coastal tourism resort microclimates

Rutty, Michelle, Scott, Daniel·2014·Tourism Geographies

Abstract

With considerable evidence demonstrating the intrinsic importance of weather and climate for tourist decision-making, the projected redistribution of climatic resources as a result of climate change is anticipated to have important consequences for temporal and spatial patterns of tourism demand. Some of the world's leading coastal tourism destinations (Mediterranean and Caribbean) have been identified as becoming ‘too hot’ for tourism. However, the microclimates of coastal tourism areas have not been considered by such assessments. With a focus on thermo-physiologically relevant climatic parameters, this paper examines the adaptive range of microclimatic conditions available in two coastal resort settings in the Caribbean islands of Barbados and Tobago. Recorded weather parameters include air temperature, black globe temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The microclimatic results, which are presented using the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), show that hourly thermal conditions can range up to 4 °C in different outdoor areas of the resort property (beach, garden, pool, cabana). This is salient in terms of characterizing tourism destinations for climate change assessments, as the results reveal that thermal conditions can vary at the micro-scale of a coastal resort, with the ability for tourists to attain thermally comfortable conditions within a single resort property. When a location becomes thermally uncomfortable (i.e. too hot), tourists can change their location (e.g. move from the pool to the beach), providing an onsite adaptive range between 1 °C and 4 °C. The results also demonstrate that thermo-physiologically relevant climatic parameters provide a more precise estimate of the available range of thermal comfort than is inferred from ambient temperature alone. The findings are discussed in the context of tourists’ climatic preferences and reveal that the microclimatic conditions recorded in this study (UTCI 29–36 °C) are well within tourists’ preferred thermal conditions and do not exceed tourists’ thermal thresholds for coastal tourism.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14616688.2014.932833

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Rutty, M., & Scott, D.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Rutty, Michelle
Venue
Tourism Geographies
Published
2014-05-27
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
346-363
ISSN
  • 1461-6688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-1340
OpenAlex
W2026204617
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
5.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Tourism Geographies (publishedVersion)
Funders
Canada Research Chairs
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Urban Heat Island Mitigation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Climate Change and Health Impacts
Keywords
coastal tourism, thermal comfort, Universal Thermal Climate Index, black globe temperature, climate change impacts on tourism, temperature thresholds, Barbados, Tobago, Caribbean tourism, relative humidity, wind speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review