Cited by 25News Media Framing and Political CommunicationJournalism and Media StudiesMedia Influence and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why Do Citizens Pay for Online Political News and Public Affairs? Socio-psychological Antecedents of Local News Paying Behaviour

Goyanes, Manuel·2020·Journalism Studies

Abstract

Local news organizations play a crucial role in informing rural or suburban communities about current events and politics. With the growing concentration of populations in large cities, many citizens may feel they are missing out on essential information about their local communities, thus affecting their knowledge about local issues and public policies. This study examines how readers’ perceptions of the financial state of local news organizations, journalists’ engagement with local communities and users’ local content creation affect readers’ paying behaviour for local news. Drawing on data from the Pew Research Center, results indicate that readers’ perceptions of the financial state of local news organizations predict their paying behaviour. Second, findings show that journalists’ engagement with their local communities and users’ content creation are crucial factors for increasing the probability of paying for local news. Finally, readers’ age is explored as a moderator between news organizations financial state and readers’ paying behaviour. This study adds to the growing literature on the socio-psychological antecedents involved in paying behaviour for local news organizations.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1461670x.2019.1694429

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. 10.1177/0093650210381738 · DOI
  2. Barnett S., 2009, Journalism, Democracy and the Public Interest: Rethinking Media Pluralism for the Digital Age
  3. 10.1080/17512786.2014.943930 · DOI
  4. 10.1002/mar.20200 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00007.x · DOI
  6. Bew R., 2006, Journalism and Local Media, 200
  7. Borja J., 1999, Local y Global: la Gestión de las Ciudades en la era de la Información MAdrid
  8. Campos-Freire F., 2010, Estudios Sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 16, 13
  9. 10.1080/1461670X.2018.1481348 · DOI
  10. 10.1177/1464884919847792 · DOI
  11. 10.1177/1931243115604883 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/08838150903102204 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/21670811.2014.937149 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/17512780701504864 · DOI
  15. 10.1080/17512786.2014.963376 · DOI
  16. 10.1080/14241277.2016.1166429 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/21670811.2016.1246373 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/21670811.2017.1279979 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/14616700120107329 · DOI
  20. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1123109 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/1461670X.2012.744551 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1177/0002764218764239 · DOI
  24. 10.1080/17512786.2014.882056 · DOI
  25. Goyanes M., 2015, International Journal of Communication, 9, 18
  26. 10.1080/16522354.2017.1346948 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/10646175.2010.496662 · DOI
  28. Jones, S., and S. Fox. 2009. Generations Online in 2009 (pp. 1–9). Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project.
  29. 10.1080/16522354.2015.1053345 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/21670811.2016.1152160 · DOI
  31. McQuail Denis., 2010, McQuail’s Mass Communication Theory
  32. 10.1080/17512780902798687 · DOI
  33. 10.1080/21670811.2016.1178074 · DOI
  34. 10.1093/ct/qty019 · DOI
  35. 10.1080/17512786.2016.1146625 · DOI
  36. 10.1017/CBO9780511609343 · DOI
  37. 10.1080/14241277.2018.1529672 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/17512786.2012.756667 · DOI
  39. 10.1080/21670811.2013.865967 · DOI
  40. Ross K., 1998, Making the Local News: Local Journalism in Context, 228
  41. 10.1177/107769900207900211 · DOI
  42. 10.1080/105846001750322952 · DOI
  43. 10.1080/1461670X.2016.1249007 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/1461444812455148 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/17512786.2015.1017595 · DOI
  46. 10.1111/j.1475-6765.2009.01913.x · DOI
  47. Sullivan John L., 2013, Media Audiences: Effects, Users, Institutions, and Power
  48. 10.1177/1461444811436146 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/0093650203253371 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.12.024 · DOI
  51. 10.1080/1461670X.2015.1042988 · DOI
  52. 10.1080/21670811.2014.965932 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/08838151.2011.648684 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goyanes, M.
Affiliations
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Corresponding author
Goyanes, Manuel
Venue
Journalism Studies
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
21
Issue
4
Pages
547-563
ISSN
  • 1461-670X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9699
OpenAlex
W2990552779
Cited by
25
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
5.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journalism Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Journalism and Media Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Media Influence and Politics
Keywords
local news, news consumption, user-generated content, age as moderator

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review