Cited by 50Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life ManagementFungal Plant Pathogen ControlNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Effect of the combined application of chitosan and carbonate salts on the incidence of anthracnose and on the quality of papaya during storage

Sivakumar, Dharini, Sultanbawa, Yasmina, Ranasingh, Nethmi, Kumara, Predeep, Wijesundera, Ravi·2005·The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Abstract

SummaryThe potential of chitosan (1%) alone, or in combination with ammonium carbonate (3%) or sodium bicarbonate (2%), to reduce the incidence of anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) on papaya (Carica papaya L.) and maintain quality was investigated during storage at 13.5°C and 95% RH for 14 d, and for 2 d under simulated market conditions (25°C, 75% RH). Chitosan alone or in combination with sodium bicarbonate or ammonium carbonate significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the severity of anthracnose in both inoculated and naturally-infected fruit. The effect of chitosan with ammonium carbonate on the incidence and severity of anthracnose was greater than chitosan alone, or chitosan with sodium bicarbonate. Chitosan with ammonium carbonate significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the incidence of anthracnose in, and the recovery of C. gloeosporioides from naturally-infected fruit compared to control fruit. Eating quality was not affected by these post-harvest dip treatments. Chitosan with ammonium carbonate retained high fruit quality, significantly (P < 0.005) retarded colour development of skin and flesh, increased fruit firmness and reduced weight loss. Internal carbon dioxide concentrations increased in chitosan-coated fruit to reach 7% in chitosan and ammonium carbonate-treated fruit. Thus, chitosan combined with ammonium carbonate represents a commercially acceptable, economically viable and effective alternative for post-harvest control of anthracnose during storage of papaya.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14620316.2005.11511958

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sivakumar, D., Sultanbawa, Y., Ranasingh, N., Kumara, P., & Wijesundera, R.
Affiliations
  • Industrial Technology Institute (LK)
  • University of Colombo (LK)
Corresponding author
Sivakumar, Dharini
Venue
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Published
2005-01
Volume
80
Issue
4
Pages
447-452
ISSN
  • 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-4084
OpenAlex
W130688583
Cited by
50
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
chitosan, ammonium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, papaya, Carica papaya, postharvest disease control, fruit storage, fruit quality, fruit firmness, fruit color development, weight loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review