Effect of the combined application of chitosan and carbonate salts on the incidence of anthracnose and on the quality of papaya during storage
Abstract
SummaryThe potential of chitosan (1%) alone, or in combination with ammonium carbonate (3%) or sodium bicarbonate (2%), to reduce the incidence of anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides) on papaya (Carica papaya L.) and maintain quality was investigated during storage at 13.5°C and 95% RH for 14 d, and for 2 d under simulated market conditions (25°C, 75% RH). Chitosan alone or in combination with sodium bicarbonate or ammonium carbonate significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the severity of anthracnose in both inoculated and naturally-infected fruit. The effect of chitosan with ammonium carbonate on the incidence and severity of anthracnose was greater than chitosan alone, or chitosan with sodium bicarbonate. Chitosan with ammonium carbonate significantly (P < 0.005) reduced the incidence of anthracnose in, and the recovery of C. gloeosporioides from naturally-infected fruit compared to control fruit. Eating quality was not affected by these post-harvest dip treatments. Chitosan with ammonium carbonate retained high fruit quality, significantly (P < 0.005) retarded colour development of skin and flesh, increased fruit firmness and reduced weight loss. Internal carbon dioxide concentrations increased in chitosan-coated fruit to reach 7% in chitosan and ammonium carbonate-treated fruit. Thus, chitosan combined with ammonium carbonate represents a commercially acceptable, economically viable and effective alternative for post-harvest control of anthracnose during storage of papaya.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Eating quality was not affected by these postharvest dip treatments.
“Eating quality was not affected by these postharvest dip treatments.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Sivakumar et al., 2005
Chitosan alone or in combination with SBC or AC significantly reduced severity of anthracnose in papaya fruit.
“Sivakumar et al. (2005) reported that chitosan alone or in combination with SBC or AC significantly reduced the severity of anthracnose in papaya fruit.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Sivakumar et al., 2005
Effect of chitosan with AC on incidence and severity of anthracnose was greater than chitosan alone, or chitosan with SBC.
“The effect of chitosan with AC on the incidence and severity of anthracnose was greater than chitosan alone, or chitosan with SBC.”
From GRAS, plant- and animal-derived compounds as alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of postharvest diseases of fresh horticultural produce (2016) · cites this paper as Sivakumar et al., 2005
Cites
Effect of ammonium carbonate and sodium bicarbonate on anthracnose of papaya
Sivakumar, D., Hewarathgamagae, N. K., Wilson Wijeratnam, R. S., & Wijesundera, R. L. C. (2002) · Phytoparasitica · doi:10.1007/bf02979753 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Palou, L., Ali, A., Fallik, E., & Romanazzi, G. (2016) · Postharvest Biology and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.postharvbio.2016.04.017 · Cited by 286 · see citing works
Bautista-Baños, S., Sivakumar, D., Bello-Pérez, A., Villanueva-Arce, R., & Hernández-López, M. (2013) · Crop Protection · doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2013.02.011 · Cited by 106 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Sivakumar, D., Sultanbawa, Y., Ranasingh, N., Kumara, P., & Wijesundera, R.
- Affiliations
- Industrial Technology Institute (LK)
- University of Colombo (LK)
- Corresponding author
- Sivakumar, Dharini
- Venue
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 80
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 447-452
- ISSN
- 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-4084
- OpenAlex
- W130688583
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
- Keywords
- chitosan, ammonium carbonate, sodium bicarbonate, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, papaya, Carica papaya, postharvest disease control, fruit storage, fruit quality, fruit firmness, fruit color development, weight loss
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review