The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Disease resistance of ‘Zill’and ‘Keitt’mango fruit to anthracnose in relation to defence enzyme activities and the content of anti-fungal substances
Abstract
SummaryMango (Magnifera indica L.) is a popular fruit, but it is susceptible to post-harvest diseases. To study the resistance of mango fruit to anthracnose disease and the possible defence mechanisms involved, the resistance of two mango cultivars (‘Zill’ and ‘Keitt’) was examined in relation to their defence enzyme systems. The results showed that in both young or commercially mature fruit inoculated with Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, lesion sizes on ‘Keitt’ fruit were smaller than on ‘Zill’ fruit. For non-inoculated fruit harvested at commercial maturity, the disease index of ‘Keitt’ was lower than that of ‘Zill’. This indicates that ‘Keitt’ was more disease resistant than ‘Zill’. Compared with ‘Zill’, ‘Keitt’ fruit showed higher phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL), peroxidase (POD), and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activities during development and storage, as well as elevated levels of H2O2, total phenolic compounds and lignin during development, and higher contents of H2O2 and lignin in harvested fruit early during storage. These results suggest that defence enzymes and compounds plays important roles in the resistance of mango fruit to anthracnose disease and could be used as indicators to screen for mango cultivars that are more resistant to post-harvest diseases.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been proposed that these could be utilized as markers to screen for mango cultivars with increased resistance to post-harvest illnesses (Gong et al., 2013).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“Natural disease resistance in Mango varieties is being exploited as a control against anthracnose disease in mango fruits (Gong et al., 2013).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“C. gloeosporioides infection of young or commercially ripe fruit resulted in reduced lesion diameters on ‘Keitt’ fruit compared to ‘Zill’ fruit (Gong et al., 2013).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“When non-inoculated fruits were harvested at commercial maturity, “Keitt” showed a lower disease index than ‘Zill’, indicating that ‘Keitt’ was more disease resistant than ‘Zill’ (Gong et al., 2013).”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“More significant amounts of hydrogen peroxide, total phenolic compounds, and lignin were found in ‘Keitt’ fruit during development and storage compared to ‘Zill’ fruit.”
From Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research (2023) · cites this paper as Gong et al., 2013
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Mango anthracnose disease: the current situation and direction for future research
Dofuor, A. K., Quartey, N. K.-A., Osabutey, A. F., Antwi-Agyakwa, A. K., Asante, K., Boateng, B. O., Ablormeti, F. K., Lutuf, H., Osei-Owusu, J., Osei, J. H. N., et al. (2023) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2023.1168203 · Cited by 103
“More significant amounts of hydrogen peroxide, total phenolic compounds, and lignin were found in ‘Keitt’ fruit during development and storage compared to ‘Zill’ fruit.”
BackgroundInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, D. Q., Zhu, S. J., Gu, H., Zhang, L. B., Hong, K. Q., & Xie, J. H.
- Affiliations
- South China Agricultural University (CN)
- Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Zhu, S.J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 243-250
- ISSN
- 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
- 2380-4084
- OpenAlex
- W2314365481
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 1.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
- Keywords
- mango, anthracnose, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, disease resistance, cultivar resistance, Keitt, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, hydrogen peroxide, lignin, total phenolic compounds, postharvest disease, fruit storage, disease index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review