Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Pre-harvest fruit bagging: a useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality – a review

Sharma, R. R., Reddy, S. V. R., Jhalegar, M. J.·2014·The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Abstract

SummarySeveral good agricultural practices (GAP) are becoming popular throughout the World for the production of high quality fruit with less dependence on man-made chemicals. Among such practices, pre-harvest fruit bagging has emerged as an effective method. Bagging is a physical protection method which not only improves the visual quality of fruit by promoting skin colouration and reducing blemishes, but can also change the micro-environment for fruit development, which can have several beneficial effects on internal fruit quality. Pre-harvest bagging of fruit can also reduce the incidence of disease, insect pest and/or mechanical damage, sunburn of the skin, fruit cracking, agrochemical residues on the fruit, and bird damage. Due to its many beneficial effects, fruit bagging has become an integral part of peach, apple, pear, grape, and loquat cultivation in Japan, Australia, China and the USA. Moreover, countries such as Mexico, Chile, and Argentina do not import apples unless they are bagged. Several studies have been conducted to identify the desirable effects of pre-harvest fruit bagging on skin colour development and quality, but contradictory results have been reported. These may be due to differences in the type of bag used, the stage of fruit development when bagged, the duration of fruit exposure to natural light following bag removal, and/or fruit- and cultivar-specific responses. Bagging is laborious and its cost:benefit ratio must be investigated in order to promote adoption of the method in much of the World. The aim of this review is to improve our understanding of the beneficial effects of bagging in different fruit by collecting otherwise scattered information so that more growers could consider using this method on a commercial scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14620316.2014.11513055

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, R. R., Reddy, S. V. R., & Jhalegar, M. J.
Venue
The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology
Published
2014-01
Volume
89
Issue
2
Pages
101-113
ISSN
  • 1462-0316 (ISSN-L)
  • 2380-4084
OpenAlex
W2332399676
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
5.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pre-harvest fruit bagging: a useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality – a review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14620316.2014.11513055
The paper
Sharma, R. R., Reddy, S. V. R., & Jhalegar, M. J. (2014). Pre-harvest fruit bagging: a useful approach for plant protection and improved post-harvest fruit quality – a review. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1080/14620316.2014.11513055

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.