The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What's going on? Parallel process and reflective practice in teaching
Abstract
Parallel process is a concept arising from the psychotherapy and social work fields and originally referred to a 'reflective space' (Searles, 1955) in which the supervisor of a therapist uses the feelings projected onto them as indicators of the unconscious dynamics the therapist is dealing with in their work with clients. This article shows how parallel process can emerge between students and teachers in the same way as it emerges between therapist and supervisor. It describes the dynamics in a student group and how they paralleled those in the staff teaching team, and illustrates how the process of reflection can reveal the unconscious dynamics in the student group. The value of parallel process is realised when these dynamics are used to gain insight into the issues that are being faced by the therapist, or in the case of this article, the student group. The data then enables teaching staff to design real time interventions that allow them to work with here and now dynamics in the student group that form the basis for rich and meaningful learning.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Real-time monitoring is crucial in developing successful and responsive educational practices, as it enables prompt decisions, promotes data-driven approaches, refines teaching strategies, and enhances student support (Vanlommel et al., 2020;Miller, 2004).”
From Data-Driven Decision-Making through Real-time Student Progress Monitoring: Academic Administrators Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as Miller, 2004
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Secreto, P. V., Ofrin, D., & Tabo, E. (2025) · International Journal in Information Technology in Governance, Education and Business · doi:10.32664/ijitgeb.v7i1.147 · Cited by 2
“Real-time monitoring is crucial in developing successful and responsive educational practices, as it enables prompt decisions, promotes data-driven approaches, refines teaching strategies, and enhances student support (Vanlommel et al., 2020; Miller, 2004).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Miller, S.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Miller, Sallyanne
- Venue
- Reflective Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-393
- ISSN
- 1462-3943 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2053547986
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reflective Practice (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- parallel processes, teacher professional development, student groups, unconscious dynamics, real-time intervention, reflective space
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What's going on? Parallel process and reflective practice in teaching. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1462394042000270682
- The paper
- Miller, S. (2004). What's going on? Parallel process and reflective practice in teaching. Reflective Practice. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462394042000270682