Writing SMARTER goals for professional learning and improving classroom practices
Abstract
Writing SMART Goals has recently become an integral part of the landscape of teacher professional learning in Australian schools, including both teacher professional development and performance management in classroom practices. This paper discusses the origins of SMART Goals and the diverse terms and definitions associated with such goal setting. Anecdotal evidence suggests that for some teachers, writing personal, professional or teaching and learning goals may be a daunting task. For school leadership teams, these goals often are the basis for operationalising school improvement over time. We make a case for clarity with SMART Goals within the context of each school, as interpreted and supported by school principals and leadership teams working with their staff. This paper concludes with some tentative suggestions for school leaders intended to improve SMART Goals, and teacher professional learning, over time. We hope this clarification and our suggestions support writing more effective learning goals for both teachers and students over time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The IQFT protocol was initially developed by combining the research framework from the question formulation technique, SMART goals, and typology of investigable and non-investigable questions.
“The IQFT protocol was initially developed by combining the research framework from the question formulation technique (Rothstein & Santana, 2017), SMART goals (Brown et al., 2016), and typology of investigable and non-investigable questions (Chin, 2002).”
From Facilitation of Student Questioning in the Malaysian Secondary Science Classroom Using the Investigable Questioning Formulation Technique (IQFT) Protocol (2023) · cites this paper as Brown et al., 2016
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 40 · Cited by 22
- Authors
- Brown, G., Leonard, C., & Arthur-Kelly, M.
- Affiliations
- NSW Department of Education (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Brown, Gail
- ORCID
- Leonard, Carl
- Venue
- Reflective Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-05-30
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 621-635
- ISSN
- 1462-3943 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2474980038
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reflective Practice (publishedVersion)
- NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › School Leadership and Teacher Performance
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Keywords
- SMART goals, goal setting, teacher learning, teacher professional development, classroom practice improvement, school leadership, school improvement, teacher performance management, learning objectives, school principals
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review