The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The importance of examining diversity in reflective supervision when working with young children and their families
Abstract
Cultural sensitivity is fundamental to relationship-based interventions where professionals meet with children and families in their homes, neighborhoods, and communities. Understanding how we are different from others and how to engage in meaningful relationships despite those differences is important at all levels of human interaction. Professionals who provide relationship-based intervention benefit from supervision aimed at enhancing their capacity for reflection. Reflective supervision has become a powerful training technique to support the professional’s capacity to think deeply about their work with vulnerable infants and families. This article will consider the impact of diversity upon the developing relationship between the reflective supervisor and supervisee. Through use of a supervisory vignette, this article will consider how cultural differences can pose a barrier to the full incorporation of the reflective experience within infant mental health work and professional growth. The authors posit that reflective supervision can support cultural sensitivity, relationship building, professional growth, and positive infant and family outcomes.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When supervisors intentionally work with supervisees to increase cultural humility, supervisees feel more confident in their work, and the families they work with receive better care.
“Researchers have found that when supervisors intentionally work with supervisees to increase cultural humility, supervisees feel more confident in their work, and the families they work with receive better care (Wilson et al., 2018).”
From Seeing Double: A Case Study Examining Systemic Supervision and Therapy Conceptualization of Identical Twins (2026) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2018
Citations
Cites
Attachment and reflective function: Their role in self-organization
FONAGY, P., & TARGET, M. (1997) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579497001399 · Cited by 1,708
Parental reflective functioning: An introduction
Slade, A. (2005) · Attachment & Human Development · doi:10.1080/14616730500245906 · Cited by 1,209
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 33
- Barrera I., 2003, Skilled dialogue: Strategies for responding to cultural diversity in early childhood, 2nd edition
- Brown B., 2012, Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent, and lead
- Eggbeer L., 2010, Journal of Zero to Three, 31, 39
- 10.1002/1097-0355(199123)12:3<164::AID-IMHJ2280120304>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
- Feltman C., 2009, The thin book of trust: Essential primer for building trust at work
- Fenichel E., 1992, Learning through supervision and mentorship to support the development of infants, toddlers and their families: A source book
- Fonagy P., 2002, Infant and toddler mental health: Models of clinical intervention with infants and their families, 57
- Fraiberg S., 1980, Clinical studies in infant mental health: The first year of life
- 10.1177/1096250611402290 · DOI
- Ghosh Ippen C., 2012, Zero to Three, 33, 23
- 10.1002/imhj.20017 · DOI
- 10.1080/07325220903324371 · DOI
- Harden B.J., 2010, Journal for Zero to Three, 30, 44
- 10.1037/14370-004 · DOI
- Heffron M.C., 2012, Zero to Three, 28, 34
- Heller S.S., 2010, A practical guide to reflective supervision
- 10.1002/imhj.21332 · DOI
- Lewis M.L., 2013, Zero to Three, 34, 11
- Lieberman A., 2008, Psychotherapy with infants and young children: Repairing the effects of stress and trauma on early attachment
- 10.1037/a0021630 · DOI
- Rosa Noroña C., 2012, Zero to Three, 33, 29
- Schafer W., 2007, Zero to Three, 28, 9
- Siegel D.J., 2010, Zero to Three, 31, 6
- St. John M.S., 2012, Zero to Three, 33(2), 13–22.
- Stroud B., 2010, Zero to Three, 46
- 10.1002/imhj.20233 · DOI
- 10.1002/imhj.21420 · DOI
- Weatherston D., 2000, Zero to Three, 21, 3
- Weatherston D., 2005, The handbook of training and practice in infant and preschool mental health, 3
- Weatherston D., 2010, A practical guide to reflective supervision (pp. 61–80)
- Weatherston D., 2015, Infant mental health home visiting: Supporting Competencies/reducing risks
- Weatherston D.J., 2011, Journal of Zero to Three, 31, 52
- Zeanah C.H., 2009, The handbook of infant mental health, 3rd edition, 5
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lowery, D. F., & Outler, C. (2026) · The Family Journal · doi:10.1177/10664807251384191
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, K., Barron, C., Wheeler, R., & Jedrzejek, P. E.-A.
- Affiliations
- Innospec (United States) (US)
- Wayne State University (US)
- Easter Seals Michigan, Auburn Hills, MI, USA
- Corresponding author
- Barron, Carla
- Venue
- Reflective Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2018-09-03
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 653-665
- ISSN
- 1462-3943 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-1103
- OpenAlex
- W2900158627
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 1.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Reflective Practice (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Keywords
- reflective supervision, cultural diversity, cultural sensitivity, relationship-based intervention, infant mental health, early childhood professionals, career development, home visiting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review