Cited by 4Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsMachine Learning in Healthcare

Use of an artificial neural network (ANN) for classifying nursing care needed, using incomplete input data

Michel, E., Zernikow, B., Wichert, S. A.·2000·Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine

Abstract

Background In German nursing insurance, the act of classifying the client into four categories of disability is based on legally defined distinct criteria. When classifying deceased persons it is often impossible to collect all the required information. Primary objective We aimed to determine the ability of an artificial neural network (ANN) to calculate the category of disability, to investigate the response of the ANN to input items of different nature, quantity and data quality, and to estimate the minimum number of training data required. Research design The investigation was conducted as a retrospective observational study. Methods and procedures The analysis was based on routine records of 14000 adult clients of the nursing insurance. Several ANNs were trained, varying nature, number and quality of the input items as well as the size of the training data set. Each ANN's classification competence was tested on independent validation data, judging the ANN's conformance to the result of the individual expert assessment, using kappa statistics. Main results Fed with all 30 input items available, the net classified 80% of cases correctly (weighted kappa = 0.78). Using three input items, weighted kappa was 0.63. Severe misclassification (deviation by more than one category in either direction) ranged between 0.2% (all 30 input items) and 3.7% (3/30 items). The less complete the individual input items were, the less accurate was the net's estimate. A 20% rate of missing values…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14639230050058329

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michel, E., Zernikow, B., & Wichert, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Emma Kinderziekenhuis (NL)
  • Witten/Herdecke University (DE)
Venue
Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine
Published
2000-01
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
147-158
ISSN
1463-9238 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2133422490
Cited by
4
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Data Mining and Machine Learning Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
artificial neural networks, disability categories, long-term care insurance, missing data, deceased persons, training data size, quality control
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adult, Disability Evaluation, Evaluation Studies as Topic, Germany, Humans, Nursing Care, Retrospective Studies, Software Validation, Neural Networks, Computer, Insurance, Disability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review