Cited by 260Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismCognitive Abilities and TestingReading and Literacy Development

Verbal Reasoning and Working Memory

Hitch, G. J., Baddeley, A. D.·1976·Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Abstract

A series of experiments was carried out to explore the hypothesis that a central working memory (WM) system is utilized during verbal reasoning. WM was provisionally defined in terms of two major features of short-term memory (STM): its limited storage capacity and its use of speech-coded information. The reasoning task required subjects to match (verify) as rapidly as possible a sentence of varying grammatical form with a symbolic referent. Experiments I and II studied the effect of storing an additional STM load on sentence verification latencies. As many as six items could be correctly recalled with no slowing of verification speed. Experiment III used a different procedure in which the STM items had to be articulated aloud during verification. In this case six-item STM loads slowed verification speed considerably, and did so more for the more difficult sentences. Only a small non-significant slowing of verification speed was obtained when redundant messages were articulated. Experiment IV showed that latencies were also increased by introducing phonemic similarity into the verification task. Generally the results were not fully consistent with the hypothesis of WM as a limited capacity store called upon by the verification task. Instead they supported the view that the WM is a general executive system with a limited capacity for information processing. It was proposed that the articulatory system, used in rehearsal and concerned with speech-coding, is a “peripheral” of th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640747608400587

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Information processing in the global workspace is closely connected to core operations of working memory, including the visuospatial sketchpad and phonological loop.

    “Information processing in the global workspace is closely connected to some of the core operations of working memory, including the visuospatial sketchpad and phonological loop.”

    From A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Hitch and Baddeley 1976

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D.
Affiliations
Medical Research Council (GB)
Venue
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
1976-11
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
603-621
ISSN
0033-555X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2032886302
Cited by
260
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
verbal reasoning, working memory, short-term memory, sentence verification, storage capacity, speech coding, articulation, phonological similarity, executive function, rehearsal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review