Verbal Reasoning and Working Memory
Abstract
A series of experiments was carried out to explore the hypothesis that a central working memory (WM) system is utilized during verbal reasoning. WM was provisionally defined in terms of two major features of short-term memory (STM): its limited storage capacity and its use of speech-coded information. The reasoning task required subjects to match (verify) as rapidly as possible a sentence of varying grammatical form with a symbolic referent. Experiments I and II studied the effect of storing an additional STM load on sentence verification latencies. As many as six items could be correctly recalled with no slowing of verification speed. Experiment III used a different procedure in which the STM items had to be articulated aloud during verification. In this case six-item STM loads slowed verification speed considerably, and did so more for the more difficult sentences. Only a small non-significant slowing of verification speed was obtained when redundant messages were articulated. Experiment IV showed that latencies were also increased by introducing phonemic similarity into the verification task. Generally the results were not fully consistent with the hypothesis of WM as a limited capacity store called upon by the verification task. Instead they supported the view that the WM is a general executive system with a limited capacity for information processing. It was proposed that the articulatory system, used in rehearsal and concerned with speech-coding, is a “peripheral” of th…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information processing in the global workspace is closely connected to core operations of working memory, including the visuospatial sketchpad and phonological loop.
“Information processing in the global workspace is closely connected to some of the core operations of working memory, including the visuospatial sketchpad and phonological loop.”
From A Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory (2024) · cites this paper as Hitch and Baddeley 1976
Cites
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.99.1.122 · Cited by 4,153 · see citing works
Working memory and the control of action: Evidence from task switching
Baddeley, A., Chincotta, D., & Adlam, A. (2001) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.641 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Self-citationWorking memory and strategies in syllogistic-reasoning tasks
Gilhooly, K. J., Logie, R. H., Wetherick, N. E., & Wynn, V. (1993) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03211170 · Cited by 236 · see citing works
What does germane load mean? An empirical contribution to the cognitive load theory
Debue, N., & van de Leemput, C. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01099 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
On the interpretation of working memory span in adults.
Towse, J. N., Hitch, G. J., & Hutton, U. (2000) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03198549 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Self-citationAn examination of the effects of argument mapping on students’ memory and comprehension performance
Dwyer, C. P., Hogan, M. J., & Stewart, I. (2013) · Thinking Skills and Creativity · doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2012.12.002 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Raven's Matrices and Working Memory: A Dual-Task Approach
Rao, K. V., & Baddeley, A. (2013) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.828314 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationA Case for AI Consciousness: Language Agents and Global Workspace Theory
Goldstein, S., & Kirk-Giannini, C. D. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.11407 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“The visuospatial sketchpad allows for storage and manipulation of mental images; the phonological loop briefly stores information related to speech, and also allows for its rehearsal (Hitch and Baddeley 1976).”
- Authors
- Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D.
- Affiliations
- Medical Research Council (GB)
- Venue
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1976-11
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 603-621
- ISSN
- 0033-555X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2032886302
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 1.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Keywords
- verbal reasoning, working memory, short-term memory, sentence verification, storage capacity, speech coding, articulation, phonological similarity, executive function, rehearsal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review