Cited by 148Reading and Literacy DevelopmentNeurobiology of Language and BilingualismPhonetics and Phonology Research

The Role of Subvocalisation in Reading

Baddeley, Alan, Eldridge, Marge, Lewis, Vivien·1981·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A

Abstract

A series of experiments explored the role of subvocalisation in fluent reading. Experiment I showed that when subjects were required to suppress articulation while reading, their ability to detect anomalous words or errors of word order in prose was markedly impaired although speed of reading was unaffected. Experiment II showed that this decrement was not a general effect due to performing a secondary task, since a concurrent tapping task did not impair detection accuracy. A third study explored the role of acoustic interference in reading by requiring subjects to detect errors in prose while attempting to ignore irrelevant speech, with or without articulatory suppression. Once again articulatory suppression led to a clear decrement in the subject's ability to detect errors, while unattended speech had no effect on performance. None of the manipulations influenced the speed with which the subjects performed the reading task. It is concluded that subvocalisation allows the creation of a supplementary articulatory code which is produced and utilised in parallel with other aspects of reading. Such a code seems particularly suitable for monitoring order information.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640748108400802

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inner speech is implicated in silent reading, with many people reporting evoked auditory or motor speech imagery while reading.

    “It is also implicated in silent reading, with many people reporting evoked auditory or motor speech imagery while reading32,33.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V.
Affiliations
MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 2EF, England
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Published
1981-11
Volume
33
Issue
4
Pages
439-454
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
OpenAlex
W1995741761
Cited by
148
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
7.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
Keywords
reading fluency, articulatory suppression, error detection, word order errors, acoustic interference, irrelevant speech, secondary task, reading speed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review