The Role of Subvocalisation in Reading
Abstract
A series of experiments explored the role of subvocalisation in fluent reading. Experiment I showed that when subjects were required to suppress articulation while reading, their ability to detect anomalous words or errors of word order in prose was markedly impaired although speed of reading was unaffected. Experiment II showed that this decrement was not a general effect due to performing a secondary task, since a concurrent tapping task did not impair detection accuracy. A third study explored the role of acoustic interference in reading by requiring subjects to detect errors in prose while attempting to ignore irrelevant speech, with or without articulatory suppression. Once again articulatory suppression led to a clear decrement in the subject's ability to detect errors, while unattended speech had no effect on performance. None of the manipulations influenced the speed with which the subjects performed the reading task. It is concluded that subvocalisation allows the creation of a supplementary articulatory code which is produced and utilised in parallel with other aspects of reading. Such a code seems particularly suitable for monitoring order information.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Inner speech is implicated in silent reading, with many people reporting evoked auditory or motor speech imagery while reading.
“It is also implicated in silent reading, with many people reporting evoked auditory or motor speech imagery while reading32,33.”
From Inner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses (2025) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Specific impairments of planning
Shallice, T. (1982) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · Cited by 3,741 · see citing works
Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading
Bookheimer, S. Y., Zeffiro, T. A., Blaxton, T., Gaillard, W., & Theodore, W. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030206 · Cited by 410 · see citing works
Broca's area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: an fMRI study
Rogalsky, C. (2008) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.014.2008 · Cited by 172 · see citing works
“Some of the evidence supporting the involvement of the phonological loop in sentence comprehension has emerged from reading comprehension and short-term memory studies involving concurrent task paradigms (e.g. Baddeley, 1981; Baddeley et al., 1975; Besner and Davelaar, 1982; Coltheart, 1993).”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialInner speech in motor cortex and implications for speech neuroprostheses
Kunz, E. M., Abramovich Krasa, B., Kamdar, F., Avansino, D. T., Hahn, N., Yoon, S., Singh, A., Nason-Tomaszewski, S. R., Card, N. S., Jude, J. J., et al. (2025) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2025.06.015 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
“All participants had experience with attempted speech decoding and preferred inner speech for its lower physical effort and more neutral outward appearance.”
- Authors
- Baddeley, A., Eldridge, M., & Lewis, V.
- Affiliations
- MRC Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 2EF, England
- ORCID
- Baddeley, Alan
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1981-11
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 439-454
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W1995741761
- Cited by
- 148
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 7.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Keywords
- reading fluency, articulatory suppression, error detection, word order errors, acoustic interference, irrelevant speech, secondary task, reading speed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review