The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination
Abstract
In three experiments we show, using behavioural measures of movement outcome, as well as movement trajectory information and resultant kinematic profiles, that there is a strong tendency for the limbs to be co-ordinated as a unitary structure even under conditions where the movements are of disparate difficulty. Environmental constraints (an obstacle placed in the path of one limb, but not in the other) are shown to modulate the space-time behaviour of both limbs (Experiment II). Our results obtain for symmetrical (Experiment I) as well as asymmetrical movements that involve non-homologous muscle groups (Experiment III). These findings suggest that in multi-joint limb movements, the many degrees of freedom are organised to function temporarily as a single coherent unit that is uniquely specific to the task demands placed on it. For movements in general, and two-handed movements in particular, such units are revealed in a partitioning of the relevant force demands for each component (a force scaling characteristic) and a preservation of the internal “topology” of the action, as indexed by the relative timing among components. These features, as well as systematic deviations from perfect synchrony between the limbs can be rationalised by a model that assumes the limbs behave qualitatively like non-linear oscillators.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences
Kirk, R. (2013) · doi:10.4135/9781483384733 · Cited by 8,539
The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.
Fitts, P. M. (1954) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0055392 · Cited by 6,466
The Geometry of Biological Time
Winfree, A. T. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-22492-2 · Cited by 3,613
Cited by
Whitall, J., Waller, S. M., Silver, K. H. C., & Macko, R. F. (2000) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/01.str.31.10.2390 · Cited by 621
Strategies and mechanisms in nonselective and selective inhibitory motor control.
De Jong, R., Coles, M. G. H., & Logan, G. D. (1995) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.21.3.498 · Cited by 274
A dynamic theory of coordination of discrete movement
Schöner, G. (1990) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00203449 · Cited by 273
Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.
de Jong, R. (1993) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance · doi:10.1037//0096-1523.19.5.965 · Cited by 268
Wright, D. L., & Shea, C. H. (2001) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2001.10608929 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Scott Kelso, J. A., Putnam, C. A., & Goodman, D.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1983-05
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 347-375
- ISSN
- 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-0740
- OpenAlex
- W2020309192
- Cited by
- 246
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14640748308402139
- The paper
- Scott Kelso, J. A., Putnam, C. A., & Goodman, D. (1983). On the Space-Time Structure of Human Interlimb Co-Ordination. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748308402139
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.