Cited by 615Gender, Labor, and Family DynamicsGender, Education, and Development IssuesFeminism, Gender, and Intersectionality

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy

Folbre, Nancy·2006·Journal of Human Development

Abstract

How should “care” be defined and measured in ways that enhance our understanding of the impact of economic development on women? This paper addresses this question, suggesting several possible approaches to the development of indices that would measure gender differences in responsibility for the financial and temporal care of dependents.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14649880600768512

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Barnett, T. ‘HIV/AIDS: cost, reproduction, and unpaid labour’, paper presented at United Nations Human Development Office Conference on Unpaid Work and the Economy: Gender, Poverty, and the Millennium Development Goals , 1–3 October. Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  2. Blackden C. M., 2006, Working Paper #73,
  3. Budig M., 2004, Family Time, The Social Organization of Care,
  4. Budlender D., 2002, Why Should we Care about Unpaid Care Work?,
  5. Chant S., 2003, New Working Paper Series, No. 11,
  6. Elson D., 1994, The Strategic Silences: Gender and Economic Policy,
  7. Elson D., 2000, UNIFEM Biennial Report,
  8. 2003, Integrating Unpaid Work into National Policies,
  9. Folbre N., 2005, Manuscript,
  10. Gornick J., 2003, Families That Work,
  11. Holloway S., 2002, Household Satellite Account (Experimental) Methodology,
  12. Horrigan M., 2004, Monthly Labor Review, pp. 3
  13. Ironmonger D., 2004, Family Time: The Social Organization of Care,, pp. 93
  14. Misra J., 2004, manuscript,
  15. Razavi, S. ‘The relevance of women's unpaid work to social policy in developing countries’, paper presented at Global Conference on Unpaid Work and the Economy: Gender, Poverty, and the Millennium Development Goals , 1–3 October. Levy Economics Institute for Bard College.
  16. 2005, Roars and Whispers, Gender and Poverty: Promises versus Action,
  17. 2005, Guide to Producing Statistics on Time Use: Measuring Paid and Unpaid Work,
  18. 2005, International Migration and the Millennium Development Goals,
  19. Yeates N., 2005, Global Migration Perspectives No. 44,
  20. Yoon J., 2005, manuscript,

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 601–615 of 615

Metadata

Authors
Folbre, N.
Corresponding author
Folbre, Nancy
Venue
Journal of Human Development
Published
2006-07
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
183-199
ISSN
  • 1464-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-9516
OpenAlex
W2097944823
Cited by
592
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 67 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 59 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 5
FWCI
23.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Human Development (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Gender, Education, and Development Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminism, Gender, and Intersectionality
Keywords
care economy, gender differences, women's empowerment, care work, economic development, household responsibilities, time use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review