The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective
Abstract
The current renewed interest in the study of borders and borderlands is paralleled by a growing concern and debate on the possibility of a border model, or models, and of a border theory, or theories. Certainly, there is a new attention to theoretical consideration and discussion that could help sharpen our understanding of borders. In this essay, I argue that a model or general framework is helpful for understanding borders, and I suggest a theory of borders. The seeds of my arguments are grounded in a variety of discussions and in the works of border scholars from a variety of social science disciplines. My contention is that the literature on borders, boundaries, frontiers, and borderland regions suggests four equally important analytical lenses: (1) market forces and trade flows, (2) policy activities of multiple levels of governments on adjacent borders, (3) the particular political clout of borderland communities, and (4) the specific culture of borderland communities. A model of border studies is presented in the second part of this essay, and I argue that these lenses provide a way of developing a model that delineates a constellation of variables along four dimensions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Logic of Scientific Discovery
(2013) · A Realist Theory of Science · doi:10.4324/9780203090732-9 · Cited by 7,731
The Rise of the Network Society
Castells, M. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9781444319514 · Cited by 4,664
Multi-Level Governance and European Integration
Hooghe, L., & Marks, G. (2002) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798216401537 · Cited by 2,598
The Frontier in American History
Johnson, A., & Turner, F. J. (1921) · The American Historical Review · doi:10.2307/1836101 · Cited by 1,418
Lösch, A. (1954) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,302
Capitalism and Modern Social Theory: An Analysis of the Writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber
Giddens, A. (1971) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803109 · Cited by 1,298
The Frontier in American History
(2017) · The SHAFR Guide Online · doi:10.1163/2468-1733_shafr_sim060120063 · Cited by 1,048
Border games: policing the U.S.-Mexico divide
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-3576 · Cited by 821
Ohmae, K. (1995) · Cited by 703
Redrawing the Line: Borders and Security in the Twenty-first Century
Andreas, P. (2003) · International Security · doi:10.1162/016228803322761973 · Cited by 590
Cited by
Sohn, C. (2014) · International Journal of Urban and Regional Research · doi:10.1111/1468-2427.12071 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Brunet-Jailly, E.
- Venue
- Geopolitics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 633-649
- ISSN
- 1465-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2062343936
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 23.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14650040500318449
- The paper
- Brunet-Jailly, E. (2005). Theorizing Borders: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Geopolitics. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040500318449
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.