The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Resilience in Climate Change and Conflict Affected Regions of Nepal
Abstract
In the face of global climate change, strengthening community resilience becomes increasingly important, especially in conflict affected countries with fragile governance. Nepal is such a country, recovering from a decade of civil war while facing several climate and environmental risks, including floods, droughts and landslides. We aim to contribute to the understanding of resilience building by drawing on case studies from Banke, Dang and Rolpa districts in Nepal. To compare the resilience of the districts we conduct field research. None of the analysed approaches to strengthen the resilience are without unintended consequences. The provision of rice in Rolpa increases food security but also creates local preferences for rice that cannot be met sustainably. In Dang and Banke aid resources themselves have become a source of conflict. We conclude that a more holistic understanding of local realities is needed to minimise unintended effects and strengthen resilience under challenging governance and (post)conflict conditions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The sparse literature on connections between climate adaptation and mitigation projects and local security points to a potential for an increase rather than decrease in local tensions in some contexts, notably related to access and use of land (190)(191)(192).”
From Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change (2021) · cites this paper as [192]
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Vicious Circles: Violence, Vulnerability, and Climate Change
Buhaug, H., & von Uexkull, N. (2021) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-014708 · Cited by 187
Abrahams, D., & Carr, E. R. (2017) · Current Climate Change Reports · doi:10.1007/s40641-017-0080-z · Cited by 79
Participatory approaches to climate adaptation, resilience, and mitigation: A systematic review
Parsons, M., Godden, N. J., Henrique, K. P., Tschakert, P., Gonda, N., Atkins, E., Steen, K., & Crease, R. P. (2025) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-025-02202-z · Cited by 70
Okpara, U. T., Stringer, L. C., & Dougill, A. J. (2017) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2017.10.002 · Cited by 38
Perspectives on contextual vulnerability in discourses of climate conflict
Okpara, U., Stringer, L., & Dougill, A. (2015) · Earth System Dynamics · doi:10.5194/esd-7-89-2016 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Vivekananda, J., Schilling, J., & Smith, D.
- Corresponding author
- Schilling, Janpeter
- Venue
- Geopolitics
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-10-02
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 911-936
- ISSN
- 1465-0045 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2066307813
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Geopolitics (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- United States Agency for International Development
- Department for International Development
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Peacebuilding and International Security
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- community resilience, climate change, post-conflict recovery, food security, rice distribution, unintended consequences of aid, floods, drought, landslides, Banke district, Dang district
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
