Agomelatine for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Agomelatine is a melatonergic antidepressant, approved for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in Europe and Australia, but not in the United States. This compound seems to be promising in the short-term and maintenance treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD). Areas covered: This paper presents an evaluation of the available data about the clinical efficacy and tolerability of agomelatine in the treatment of GAD. Expert opinion: First-line GAD treatments are limited by high rates of lack of clinical response. Preliminary data would indicate agomelatine as a safe compound, and with a higher rate of clinical response in the short-term and an earlier improvement of symptoms with respect to Selective Serotonine Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) and Selective Serotonin Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors (SNRIs). In addition, agomelatine has not been associated with potential risk of abuse as in case of pregabalin and with long-term metabolic side effects similar to quetiapine. The major limitation of the results presented is that little data has come from long-term or comparative trials. Furthermore, some caution should be reserved in case of liver impairment (e.g. in subjects with alcohol abuse).
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Agomelatine has been shown to positively affect sleep-related measures including REM and slow wave sleep and the quality of sleep, so it is likely to be particularly useful for anxiety patient populations with sleep-related symptoms including PTSD and OCD.
“Since agomelatine has been shown to positively affect sleep-related measures including REM and slow wave sleep and the quality of sleep (Buoli et al., 2017;Guardiola-Lemaitre et al., 2014;Levitan et al., 2015), it is likely to be particularly useful for anxiety patient populations with sleep-related symptoms including also PTSD and OCD (De Berardis et al., 2015).”
From Novel pharmacological targets in drug development for the treatment of anxiety and anxiety-related disorders (2019) · cites this paper as Buoli et al., 2017
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 58 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Buoli, M., Grassi, S., Serati, M., & Altamura, A. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Milan (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Buoli, Massimiliano
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-07-28
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1373-1379
- ISSN
- 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-7666
- OpenAlex
- W2738561980
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 58
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9
- FWCI
- 5.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
- Keywords
- agomelatine, generalized anxiety disorder, melatonergic antidepressants, clinical efficacy, tolerability, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, substance abuse risk, metabolic side effects, liver dysfunction, alcohol abuse, maintenance therapy
- MeSH terms
- Acetamides, Animals, Anxiety Disorders, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Humans, Naphthalenes, Product Surveillance, Postmarketing, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Treatment Outcome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review