Cited by 168Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityReproductive tract infections researchFungal Plant Pathogen Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Current treatment options for vulvovaginal candidiasis caused by azole-resistant Candida species

Sobel, J. D., Sobel, R.·2018·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Clinicians are increasingly challenged by patients with refractory vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) caused by azole-resistant Candida species. Fluconazole resistant C.albicans is a growing and perplexing problem following years of indiscriminate drug prescription and unnecessary drug exposure and for which there are few therapeutic alternatives. Regrettably, although the azole class of drugs has expanded, new classes of antifungal drugs have not been forthcoming, limiting effective treatment options in patients with azole resistant Candida vaginitis. AREAS COVERED: This review covers published data on epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment options for women with azole-resistant refractory VVC. EXPERT OPINION: Fluconazole resistant C.albicans adds to the challenge of azole resistant non-albicans Candida spp. Both issues follow years of indiscriminate drug prescription and unnecessary fluconazole exposure. Although an understanding of azole resistance in yeast has been established, this knowledge has not translated into useful therapeutic advantage. Treatment options for such women with refractory symptoms are extremely limited. New therapeutic options and strategies are urgently needed to meet this challenge of azole drug resistance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14656566.2018.1476490

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 56 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Denning D, 2018, Lancet Infect Dis
  2. Kalaiarasan K, 2017, J Clin Diagn Res, 11, DC06
  3. Pappas PG, 2016, Clin Infect Dis, 62(4):e1-50
  4. Patel PK, 2012, AIDS Res Treat, 2012, 262471
  5. Clark-Ordóñez I, 2017, Med Mycol
  6. Sanglard D, 2016, Front Med (Lausanne), 15, 11
  7. De Seta F, 2009, J Antimicrob Chemother
  8. White DJ, 1993, Genitourin Med, 69, 112

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–168 of 168

Metadata

Authors
Sobel, J. D., & Sobel, R.
Affiliations
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • Thomas Jefferson University Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Sobel, J. D.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2018-06-13
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
971-977
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2809133082
Cited by
168
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
not funded
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
Keywords
vaginal candidiasis, azole resistance, Candida albicans, fluconazole resistance, non-albicans Candida, antifungal resistance, Candida vaginitis
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Boric Acids, Candida, Candidiasis, Vulvovaginal, Female, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Fluconazole, Drug Resistance, Fungal, 14-alpha Demethylase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review