Cited by 20China's Ethnic Minorities and RelationsChina's Socioeconomic Reforms and GovernanceHong Kong and Taiwan Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 1988 Nanjing incident: Notes on race and politics in contemporary China

Open access
Lufrano, Richard·1994·Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars

Abstract

On the evening of 24 December 1988 Chinese and African students scuffled at the gates of a Nanjing university. The next night thousands of angry Chinese university students poured down Nanjing's main street toward the heart of the city. Although they would later chant slogans demanding democracy and calling for human rights, on this night they shouted only dadao heigui (down with niggers) and heigui gunhuiqu (niggers get the hell out) as well as other epithets. This “extraordinary combination” of democratic and racist slogans in late 1988 puzzled outside observers of China. This article argues that neither the existence of racism among educated Chinese nor the struggle for democracy alone are enough to explain the intensity of the original clash and its aftermath. Arguments that the incident simply signified an ugly outburst of racism or that students merely used the initial incident as a pretext for pushing for democracy lack sufficient explanatory power. In fact, it is precisely this “extraordinary” pairing of slogans that may reveal something about society, politics, and the educated elite in contemporary China.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14672715.1994.10416153

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Berlin Isaiah, 1992, New York Review of Books, 39

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 20

Metadata

Authors
Lufrano, R.
Corresponding author
Lufrano, Richard
Venue
Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars
Published
1994-06
Volume
26
Issue
1-2
Pages
83-92
ISSN
0007-4810 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2955142405
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Bulletin of Concerned Asian Scholars (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › China's Ethnic Minorities and Relations
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics
Keywords
racism, Chinese university students, student protest, democratic movement, educated elites, race and politics, Nanjing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review