Development of intercultural competence among US American teachers: professional development factors that enhance competence
Abstract
The increasing diversity of the student age population in the USA calls for increased cultural competence on behalf of educators to effectively teach students. This article reports on a study of a suburban school district’s initiatives that utilized the Development Model of Intercultural Sensitivity, the Intercultural Development Inventory (IDI) as a baseline measurement tool, and subsequent professional development for teachers, to promote the development of intercultural competence. ANOVA and regression analysis models were used to determine the variables that affect teachers’ perceived intercultural competence after their participation in professional development.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 37 · Cited by 123
- Authors
- DeJaeghere, J. G., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- DeJaeghere, Joan G.
- ORCID
- DeJaeghere, Joan G.
- Venue
- Intercultural Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-06
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 255-268
- ISSN
- 1467-5986 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8439
- OpenAlex
- W2050529370
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 22.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Intercultural Education (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Global Education and Multiculturalism
- Social Sciences › Communication › International Student and Expatriate Challenges
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Keywords
- intercultural competence, cultural competence, teacher professional development, Intercultural Development Inventory, teacher perceptions, student diversity, suburban school districts
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review