Cited by 99Geotechnical Engineering and Soil StabilizationConcrete and Cement Materials ResearchGeotechnical and construction materials studies

Fly ash based geopolymer stabilisation of silty clay/blast furnace slag for subgrade applications

Sukprasert, Sart, Hoy, Menglim, Horpibulsuk, Suksun, Arulrajah, Arul, Rashid, Ahmad Safuan A., Nazir, Ramli·2021·Road Materials and Pavement Design

Abstract

The mechanical and microstructural properties of problematic silty clay (SC) stabilised with fly ash (FA) based geopolymer and blast furnace slag (BFS) replacement are presented in this research. The influence factors evaluated included FA:BFS replacement ratio, NaOH concentration, and curing temperature. A series of geotechnical laboratory tests and microstructural analyses were also undertaken. The strength of the stabilised material was found to be governed by interparticle forces, mainly from the contribution of the chemical bonding strength. The results indicated that the unconfined compression strength (UCS) values of FA based geopolymers stabilised with SC/BFS blends increased with increasing NaOH concentration, at the various FA:BFS replacement ratios when cured at various temperatures (25, 50 and 80°C). The high concentration of NaOH could dissolve FA particles to leach silica and alumina which reacted with NaOH to produce a geopolymerization (N-A-S-H gel) process, which resulted in high UCS results. The decrease in FA:BFS ratio however reduced the specific area of particles to be welded by FA geopolymerization products and reduces the geopolymer gel due to the reduction in quantity of FA precursor. As such, the interparticle forces increased as the FA:BFS reduced up to the optimum value and then decreased as the FA:BFS reduced. The optimal FA:BFS ratio was found to be 20:10. An elevated curing temperature accelerated the geopolymerization reaction, leading to the hi…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14680629.2019.1621190

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sukprasert, S., Hoy, M., Horpibulsuk, S., Arulrajah, A., Rashid, A. S. A., & Nazir, R.
Affiliations
  • Suranaree University of Technology (TH)
  • University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
  • Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
  • School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia
Corresponding author
Horpibulsuk, Suksun
Venue
Road Materials and Pavement Design
Published
2019-05-30
Volume
22
Issue
2
Pages
357-371
ISSN
  • 1468-0629 (ISSN-L)
  • 2164-7402
OpenAlex
W2947858849
Cited by
99
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Road Materials and Pavement Design (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Suranaree University of Technology (-)
  • Thailand Research Fund (RTA5980005)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Geotechnical and construction materials studies
Keywords
fly ash geopolymer, blast furnace slag, silty clay, soil stabilization, subgrade, unconfined compressive strength, NaOH concentration, curing temperature, N-A-S-H gel, interparticle interactions, chemical bonding, microstructure, geopolymerization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review