The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The mediatized border: technologies and affects of migrant reception in the Greek and Italian borders
Open accessAbstract
In line with the European self-description of its borders as a space of “humanitarian securitization,” this article approaches the border as a network of mediations around migrants and refugees, where emotions of fear and empathy co-exist through digital connectivities—what we call the “mediatized border.” Drawing on media, security, and gender studies, we demonstrate how such techno-affective networks are constitutive of (rather than simply complementary to) the border as a hybrid site of both military protection and care for the vulnerable. We do this through hermeneutic and participatory engagements with the two main border sites of the 2015 migration “crisis,” Italy and Greece, and discuss their implications on our understanding of the power relationships of human mobility.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In this sense, harraga videos evoke emotions that stand in opposition to the panic, fear, compassion, anger, or despair mobilized in other contexts in which borders are mediated (Bayramoğlu, 2021; Chouliaraki and Musarò, 2017: 536).”
From Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration (2023) · cites this paper as Chouliaraki and Musarò, 2017: 536
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Casualties of CareImmigration and the Politics of Humanitarianism in France
Ticktin, M. (2011) · doi:10.1525/california/9780520269040.001.0001 · Cited by 779
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- Agamben Giorgio, 1998, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life, 10.1515/9780804764025 · DOI
- 10.1177/03043754020270S105 · DOI
- Calhoun Craig, 2010, Contemporary States of Emergency, 29
- 10.1080/1461670X.2012.718559 · DOI
- 10.1080/15405702.2017.1281415 · DOI
- 10.1111/jcom.12291 · DOI
- Cohn Carol, 1993, Gendering War Talk, 227, 10.1515/9781400863235.227 · DOI
- 10.1162/016228800560327 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1752971914000256 · DOI
- Cuttitta Paolo, 2014, ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 13, 196
- David Chandler, 2008, Security Dialogue, 39, 465
- Fraser Nancy, 2008, Adding Insult to Injury: Nancy Fraser Debates Her Critics, 273
- Gregg Melissa, 2010, The Affect Theory Reader, 10.1215/9780822393047 · DOI
- 10.1515/nor-2017-0181 · DOI · Paper page
- Hynes Samuel, 1998, The Soldiers’ Tale: Bearing Witness to a Modern War
- Moore Kerry, 2012, Migrations and the Media
- 10.1177/0163443716672296 · DOI
- 10.1177/1368431006063331 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0260210511000490 · DOI
- Paasi Anssi, 1996, Territories, Boundaries and Consciousness: The Changing Geographies of the Finnish-Russian Borders
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199999736.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1080/14650040903081297 · DOI
- Rid Thomas, 2009, War 2.0: Irregular Warfare in the Information Age
- 10.1016/j.polgeo.2013.12.003 · DOI
- 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747024.001.0001 · DOI
- Walters William, 2011, Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges, 138
- 10.1177/0967010610393549 · DOI
Cited by
Border countervisuality: smartphone videos of border crossing and migration
Bayramoğlu, Y. (2023) · Media, Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/01634437221136013 · Cited by 10
“In this sense, harraga videos evoke emotions that stand in opposition to the panic, fear, compassion, anger, or despair mobilized in other contexts in which borders are mediated (Bayramoğlu, 2021; Chouliaraki and Musarò, 2017: 536).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Chouliaraki, L., & Musarò, P.
- Affiliations
- London School of Economics and Political Science (GB)
- University of Bologna (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Chouliaraki, Lilie
- Venue
- Feminist Media Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2017-06-19
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 535-549
- ISSN
- 1468-0777 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5902
- OpenAlex
- W2718945735
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4
- FWCI
- 8.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- orcid.org
- Locations
- Feminist Media Studies (publishedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- London School of Economics and Political Science Theses Online (London School of Economics and Political Science) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Gender and Women's Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration, Refugees, and Integration
- Keywords
- migrant reception, refugees, affect, emotions, digital connectivity, gender, care, human mobility, 2015 refugee crisis, Italian border, border security, power relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
