Cited by 13Disability Rights and RepresentationDisability Education and EmploymentDecolonial Thought and Epistemologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depathologising the university

Open access
Goodley, Dan·2025·Pedagogy, Culture & Society

Abstract

This paper develops a conversation with decolonisation to pitch a novel mode of engagement; depathologising the university.While higher education institutions are in the midst of an Equality, Diversity and Inclusion revolution, I posit that all is not well.Too often disability staff and students have been sidelined in Equality, Diversity and Inclusion discourse and practice and this paper addresses this omission.First, I pose a question 'what is the university for?' and consider two recent campaigns by Black and Minority Ethnic and disabled students in the UK that offer partial responses to this question.I argue that these campaigns not only implicate the colonial and ableist heritage of universities but also illuminate two critical modes of engagement: decolonisation and depathologisation.Second, to focus the discussion, I introduce Disability Matters; a new six year programme of research which seeks to promote more inclusive university environments through positioning disability as the driving subject of inquiry.Third, I offer some provisional and anticipatory thoughts by sitting with decolonisation in order to expand upon a project of depathologisation.I conclude with an appeal; desiring disability's disruptive qualities to rethink the university.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14681366.2024.2316007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. 10.1080/09687599.2017.1322497 · DOI
  2. 10.1177/14782103211003441 · DOI
  3. 10.1080/14681369900200045 · DOI
  4. 10.1038/d41586-022-03253-y · DOI
  5. 10.1080/1070289X.2020.1753415 · DOI
  6. 10.1080/2194587X.2016.1260478 · DOI
  7. 10.1177/0162243913513643 · DOI
  8. 10.1108/QRJ-05-2022-0072 · DOI
  9. Brown, N., and J. Leigh. 2020. Ableism in Academia, Theorising Experiences of Disability and Chronic Illnesses in Higher Education. London: UCL Press.
  10. 10.1057/9781137023001_15 · DOI
  11. 10.1080/14681366.2020.1788124 · DOI
  12. 10.18061/dsq.v35i2.4637 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01596300500510229 · DOI
  14. 10.1080/09687590601056204 · DOI
  15. 10.4324/9780203366974 · DOI
  16. 10.13169/intljofdissocjus.1.1.0027 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/13504630.2014.995347 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1177/2059799118787756 · DOI
  19. 10.1017/S1474746421000567 · DOI
  20. 10.1086/705782 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/17508487.2023.2234952 · DOI
  22. 10.1215/26410478-7615003 · DOI
  23. Lee, C. 2022. “Cripping the Medical Humanities, Disability, Ableism, and Access Intimacy.” Consortium, an International Journal of Literary and Cultural Studies 2 (2): 14–60.
  24. Lee, C. 2023. “Research Ethics and the Ethics of Care for Marginalised Disabled Researchers in the “Post-Pandemic” Academy.” In Keynote Presentation Promoting Anti-Racist and Anti-Disablist Research Cultures Symposium, Jukly 13th 2023, iHuman and School of Education. The Wave, University of Sheffield. Accessed July 12th, 2023.
  25. 10.1007/s10916-022-01803-5 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1080/13562517.2020.1789858 · DOI
  27. 10.1080/23311886.2015.1053183 · DOI
  28. 10.4102/the.v5i0.85 · DOI
  29. McIntosh, P. 2007. White Privilege, Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack. Annapolis: Environmental Research Foundation. Retrieved from SciTech Premium Collection. https://www.proquest.com/reports/white-privilege-unpacking-invisible-knapsack/docview/205060540/se-2.
  30. Meekosha, H. 2008. “Contextualizing Disability, Developing Southern Theory.” Keynote Presentation Disability Studies Association 4th conference, Lancaster. September 2nd - 4th, 2008.
  31. 10.1080/09687599.2011.602860 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1080/1323238X.2009.11910861 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Nature. 2022a. Editorial Racism Overcoming Science’s Toxic Legacy. Accessed December 13th 2022. https://www.nature.com/immersive/d42859-022-00031-8/index.html.
  34. Nature. 2022b. Fighting Racism Demands More Than Just Words. 583:319–322. Accessed December 13th 2022. https://media.nature.com/original/magazine-assets/d41586-020-01883-8/d41586-020-01883-8.pdf.
  35. Netflix. 2020. Crip Camp, a Disability Revolution. Film available. https://www.netflix.com/gb/title/81001496.
  36. 10.1007/978-1-349-20895-1 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1007/978-1-349-24269-6 · DOI
  38. 10.1353/ken.2019.0023 · DOI
  39. Rizvi, S. 2023. “Toward Unruly Existence and the Politics of Excellence in University Research Cultures.” In Keynote Presentation Promoting Anti-Racist and Anti-Disablist Research Cultures Symposium, Jukly 13th 2023, iHuman and School of Education. The Wave, University of Sheffield. Accessed July 12th, 2023.
  40. Shildrick, M. 2012. “Critical Disability Studies, Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity.” In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 30–41. London: Routledge.
  41. 10.1080/13504630.2014.995352 · DOI
  42. 10.1007/978-1-137-02019-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1136/medhum-2021-012198 · DOI
  44. Titchkosky, T. 2011. The Question of Access, Disability, Space, Meaning. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  45. 10.3828/jlcds.2015.1 · DOI
  46. 10.3898/NewF:100-101.13.2020 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01162 · DOI
  48. Tuck, E., and K. W. Yang. 2012. “Decolonization is Not a Metaphor.” Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society 1 (1): 1–40.
  49. 10.1080/14681366.2022.2156583 · DOI
  50. 10.1057/dev.2008.17 · DOI
  51. 10.3390/soc2030075 · DOI
  52. 10.1177/2041905819891374 · DOI
  53. 10.1080/00313220600769331 · DOI
  54. Zondi, S. 2022. “A Fragmented Humanity and Monologues, Towards a Diversal Humanism.” In Decolonising the Human, Reflections from Africa on Difference and Oppression, edited by M. Steyn and W. Mpofu, 224–242. Johannesburg: Wits University Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Goodley, D.
Affiliations
University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Goodley, Dan
Venue
Pedagogy, Culture & Society
Published
2024-02-12
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
1001-1018
ISSN
  • 0965-9757 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-1366
  • 1747-5104
OpenAlex
W4391752632
Cited by
13
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Pedagogy Culture and Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (226705/z/22/z)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disability Rights and Representation
  • Social Sciences › Education › Disability Education and Employment
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Decolonial Thought and Epistemologies
Keywords
decolonization, disability in higher education, equality, diversity and inclusion, ableism, Black and minority ethnic students, students with disabilities, purpose of the university

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review