Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceptions of Muslim parents and teachers towards sex education in Pakistan

Abstract

This comparative cross-sectional study provides insight into the perceptions of Pakistani Muslim parents and teachers with respect to sex education. A validated questionnaire was distributed to 418 participants, using uncontrolled quota sampling and a total of 273 subjects responded. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS v.25. In this study, 76.1% of the parents and 64.4% of the teachers responded affirmatively when asked whether they thought that age-appropriate sexuality education should be provided in school. However, most believed that sex education was in conflict with Islamic ideology. ‘Bullying prevention’ and ‘sexual abuse prevention’ were strongly supported sexuality-related topics while pregnancy prevention was the least supported. The major perceived challenge to the implementation of sexuality education was that some parents did not want the subject taught in schools. Around 46% of the parents responding said that they had never even spoken to their child about sexual issues. Therefore, prior the introduction of any such curriculum-based programme, it is imperative to educate the general population and train teachers to ensure the provision of high-quality sex education. The development of scientifically accurate, age-appropriate and context-relevant sex education and the identification of modalities for its effective implementation remains a major challenge in Pakistan.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14681811.2020.1753032

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 24 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Al Quaiz, 2012, Saudi Medical Journal, 33, 1001
  2. Ali T. S., 2006, The Journal of Pakistan Medical Association, 56, 68
  3. Kirby D., 2011, Reducing Adolescent Sexual Risk: A Theoretical Guide for Developing and Adapting Curriculum-Based Programs
  4. Ogunjimi D. R., 2006, Educational Research and Reviews, 1, 347
  5. Onwuezobe I. A., 2009, Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 25, 934
  6. Sathar Z. A., 2003, Islamabad, Population Council
  7. Shahid A., 2012, Pakistan Journal of Medical Research, 51, 46
  8. Shahid Ul Islam M., 2008, The Dhaka University Journal of Islamic Studies, 2, 1
  9. Shaikh A., 2018, Cureus, 10, 5
  10. Talpur A. A., 2012, Education, 62, 708
  11. Toor K. K., 2016, MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 2, 2

Cited by

See all 72

Metadata

Authors
Nadeem, A., Cheema, M. K., & Zameer, S.
Affiliations
National University of Medical Sciences (PK)
Corresponding author
Cheema, Maryam Khalid
Venue
Sex Education
Published
2020-04-30
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
106-118
ISSN
  • 1468-1811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-0825
OpenAlex
W3021990126
Cited by
51
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 1
FWCI
7.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Sex Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Sexuality, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Islamic Studies
Keywords
sex education, Muslim parents, teacher perceptions, parental attitudes, Islamic ideology, bullying prevention, sexual abuse prevention, contraception, parent-teacher communication, teacher professional development, Pakistan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perceptions of Muslim parents and teachers towards sex education in Pakistan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14681811.2020.1753032
The paper
Nadeem, A., Cheema, M. K., & Zameer, S. (2021). Perceptions of Muslim parents and teachers towards sex education in Pakistan. Sex Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2020.1753032

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.