Cited by 142Climate Change Policy and EconomicsClimate Change and Sustainable DevelopmentInternational Environmental Law and Policies

National climate change mitigation legislation, strategy and targets: a global update

Open access
Iacobuta, Gabriela, Dubash, Navroz K., Upadhyaya, Prabhat, Deribe, Mekdelawit, Höhne, Niklas·2018·Climate Policy

Abstract

Global climate change governance has changed substantially in the last decade, with a shift in focus from negotiating globally agreed greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets to nationally determined contributions, as enshrined in the 2015 Paris Agreement. This paper analyses trends in adoption of national climate legislation and strategies, GHG targets, and renewable and energy efficiency targets in almost all UNFCCC Parties, focusing on the period from 2007 to 2017. The uniqueness and added value of this paper reside in its broad sweep of countries, the more than decade-long coverage and the use of objective metrics rather than normative judgements. Key results show that national climate legislation and strategies witnessed a strong increase in the first half of the assessed decade, likely due to the political lead up to the Copenhagen Climate Conference in 2009, but have somewhat stagnated in recent years, currently covering 70% of global GHG emissions (almost 50% of countries). In comparison, the coverage of GHG targets increased considerably in the run up to adoption of the Paris Agreement and 89% of global GHG emissions are currently covered by such targets. Renewable energy targets saw a steady spread, with 79% of the global GHG emissions covered in 2017 compared to 45% in 2007, with a steep increase in developing countries.Key policy insights The number of countries that have national legislation and strategies in place increased strongly up to 2012, but the increase has levelled off in recent years, now covering 70% of global emissions by 2017 (48% of countries and 76% of global population).Economy-wide GHG reduction targets witnessed a strong increase in the build up to 2015 and are adopted by countries covering 89% of global GHG emissions (76% not counting USA) and 90% of global population (86% not counting USA) in 2017.Renewable energy targets saw a steady increase throughout the last decade with coverage of countries in 2017 comparable to that of GHG targets.Key shifts in national measures coincide with landmark international events – an increase in legislation and strategy in the build-up to the Copenhagen Climate Conference and an increase in targets around the Paris Agreement – emphasizing the importance of the international process to maintaining national momentum.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2018.1489772

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 142

Authors
Iacobuta, G., Dubash, N. K., Upadhyaya, P., Deribe, M., & Höhne, N.
Affiliations
  • Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands
  • Centre for Policy Research (IN)
  • Linköping University (SE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
  • NewClimate Institute (DE)
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2018-07-04
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1114-1132
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W2861144014
Cited by
142
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
FWCI
24.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
  • Oak Foundation
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation (R1603150748)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate Change and Sustainable Development
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › International Environmental Law and Policies
Keywords
climate change mitigation, climate strategy, greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, renewable energy targets, energy efficiency targets, Paris Agreement, Nationally Determined Contributions, Copenhagen climate conference, developing countries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review