Beyond peak emission transfers: historical impacts of globalization and future impacts of climate policies on international emission transfers
Open accessAbstract
Globalization of supply chains has resulted in rapid increases in emission transfers from the developing to the developed world. As outsourcing has risen, developed countries have been able to decarbonize domestically, at the expense of increased emissions in developing countries. However, the rapid improvement of carbon efficiency in developing regions together with the post-2008 deceleration in international trade raises the question of whether such embodied emission transfers have peaked. Here we update historical analysis, finding that emission transfers between OECD and non-OECD countries peaked in 2006, and have been declining since. The reversal is principally due to the reduction in the emissions intensity of traded goods, rather than the volume of trade. A more recent decline in embodied emissions transfers is also observed in trade between developing countries. We analyse whether these trends are likely to continue, by exploring a baseline and a Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) scenario with the Macro-econometric Energy-Environment-Economy Model (E3ME) model. The results suggest that absolute embodied emissions will plateau at current levels or slowly return to pre-2008- crisis levels, and differences between the NDC and baseline scenarios imply that NDC policies will not result in significant carbon leakage. However, the share of national footprint embodied in imports, at least for countries with ambitious decarbonization policies, will likely increase. This suggests that, despite the world-wide stabilization of emissions transfers, addressing emissions embodied in imports will become increasingly important for reducing carbon footprints.Key policy insights Emissions embodied in imports have plateaued since 2006, and are unlikely to return to the peak of the mid-2000s.For developed countries, as domestic decarbonization occurs, the share of emissions embodied in imports as a percentage of the total national carbon footprint will increase.The Paris NDCs in themselves are unlikely to cause significant carbon leakage.Climate policy will ideally focus on reducing both production and consumption emissions, through a variety of mechanisms, especially centred around international assistance.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Net emission transfers from developed/OECD to developing/non-OECD countries peaked around 2006 and declined thereafter, reaching a pre-2000 level by 2019.
“The historical increase in aggregate emission transfers from developing to developed countries peaked around 2006 and declined since.”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
The decline in net transfers is mainly due to declining emissions intensity of traded goods, especially from developing countries, which has outpaced increasing trade volume since 2006.
“This is mainly due to a declining emissions intensity of traded goods, especially from developing countries, which has outpaced the effects of increasing trade volume since 2006 (18).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [18]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 47 · Cited by 90
- Authors
- Wood, R., Grubb, M., Anger-Kraavi, A., Pollitt, H., Rizzo, B., Alexandri, E., Stadler, K., Moran, D., Hertwich, E., & Tukker, A.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Cambridge Econometrics (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
- Yale University (US)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Wood, Richard
- ORCID
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2019-06-11
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- sup1
- Pages
- S14-S27
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W2950132304
- Cited by
- 90
- References
- 47
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- FP7 Environment (603386)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Environmental Impact and Sustainability
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
- Keywords
- embodied emissions, carbon leakage, outsourcing, Nationally Determined Contributions, climate policy scenarios, decarbonization, developing countries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review