The making of green steel in the EU: a policy evaluation for the early commercialization phase
Open accessAbstract
In the attempt to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from steel production, several large industry decarbonization projects have emerged in Europe. The commercialization of low-emission steel technology, however, faces systemic barriers such as a lack of infrastructure and unclear demand for greener steel. As part of its new commitment to climate-neutrality, the European Commission has announced plans to more actively create and reshape markets for green basic materials. The approach is inspired by the recent success story of renewable energy, where market interventionist policy has successfully led to cost reductions and supported the diffusion of wind and photovoltaics. However, the applicability of this type of policy to decarbonize basic materials has so far not been investigated. In this study, we evaluate the effectiveness, feasibility, efficiency and fairness of early commercialization policy support for the decarbonization transition of steel. We compare two approaches: demand side market creation and direct production subsidies through carbon contracts for difference. We find that the subsidy approach can more effectively enable the realization of primary green steel production. A complementary use of market creation policy instruments can reduce the production subsidy volumes needed and aid the global diffusion of new production methods. Although effective, we find that production subsidies will distribute the costs and benefits of the transition unequally. In order to improve effectiveness and fairness of the policy, parallel programmes such as electricity price guarantees and transitional assistance policies for disadvantaged regions are needed.Key policy insights Carbon contracts for difference are the most promising policy instrument to commercialize low-emission primary steel but are likely to lead to unequal distribution of transition costs.Market creation policies can support the global diffusion of low-emission primary steelmaking.Material efficiency and demand reduction can reduce the need for primary steel production by more than 50%.Regions without access to large amounts of renewable electricity are especially disadvantaged.Unclear EU ETS benchmarks currently create a perverse incentive that keeps firms from investing in breakthrough technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
GPP can create early niches with the potential to develop into lead markets and early signals for broader policy agendas.
“This can create early niches with the potential to develop into lead markets (136) and early signals for broader policy agendas.”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
In Germany and Switzerland, governments use sustainable building rating systems or carbon performance targets to incorporate LCAs into procurement criteria.
“For example, in Germany and Switzerland governments use sustainable building rating systems or carbon performance targets to incorporate LCAs into their procurement criteria (119, 136).”
From Carbon Leakage, Consumption, and Trade (2022) · cites this paper as [136]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 55 · Cited by 119
- Authors
- Vogl, V., Åhman, M., & Nilsson, L. J.
- Affiliations
- Lund University (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Vogl, Valentin
- Venue
- Climate Policy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-08-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-92
- ISSN
- 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
- 1752-7457
- OpenAlex
- W3048371058
- Cited by
- 119
- References
- 55
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 13.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Climate Policy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Swedish Energy Agency (HYBRIT-RP1)
- H2020 (730053 REINVENT)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Climate Change Policy and Economics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Iron and Steelmaking Processes
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
- Keywords
- green steel, steel industry decarbonization, production subsidies, EU Emissions Trading System, technology diffusion, renewable electricity, EU climate policy, industrial decarbonization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review