Cited by 64Climate Change Communication and PerceptionMisinformation and Its ImpactsSocial Media and Politics

Bots and online climate discourses: Twitter discourse on President Trump’s announcement of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

Marlow, Thomas, Miller, Sean, Roberts, J. Timmons·2021·Climate Policy

Abstract

In the early days of social media, social scientists speculated that it could support democracy because large media conglomerates could not dominate it. Regarding climate change, research documents the influence of the fossil fuel industry in climate denial discourses in the traditional media. Therefore, a similar hope emerged that a more democratized platform would see less polarization in belief about climate change's scientific basis. However, online public opinion about climate change continues to be extremely polarized, and the social forces behind it are not well understood. Here, we examine the role of one proposed mechanism for the systemic polarization and spread of disinformation in online discourses - the automated social media bot. This article pioneers the use of bot detection software on climate change discussion on Twitter, using automated monitoring of 6.8 million tweets. We examine the period around the time of U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on June 1, 2017. We find that the announcement generated an immediate online social movement response with very low suspected bot presence. Prior to and afterwards, however, suspected bots were responsible for approximately 25% of original tweets. Additionally, we find that suspected bots were more frequent in some topic areas than others, including denialist discourses focused on research questioning the reality or importance of climate change.Key policy insights On an average day during our study period, automated bots produced an estimated one-quarter of all original tweets referencing climate change and global warming.Bots were more active in some discussion areas than others - including climate denialist messages.President Trump's announcement of the U.S.'s planned withdrawal from the Paris Agreement generated an immediate online social movement response with very low suspected bot presence.For social media to deliver on its promise of a decentralized and democratic forum, automated accounts need to be identified, marginalized, and removed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14693062.2020.1870098

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anonymity online permits the spread of low-quality information with minimal social cost and provides cover for bots brute-forcing a message onto a network.

    “Anonymity online similarly permits the spread of low-quality information with minimal social cost and provides cover for bots brute-forcing a message onto a network”

    From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [110]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32 · Cited by 64

Authors
Marlow, T., Miller, S., & Roberts, J. T.
Affiliations
  • New York University Abu Dhabi (AE)
  • Providence, United States
  • Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Marlow, Thomas
Venue
Climate Policy
Published
2021-01-15
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
765-777
ISSN
  • 1469-3062 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-7457
OpenAlex
W3120382881
Cited by
64
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
14.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Climate Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Brown University Data Science Initiative
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
social bots, bot detection, climate change denial, Paris Agreement withdrawal, Donald Trump, Twitter, online polarization, disinformation, climate change discourse, social movements, fossil fuel industry influence, automated accounts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review