Back to the future? Nordic total defence concepts
Abstract
Russia’s aggression against Ukraine has forced the greatest a re-appraisal of European security since the end of the Cold War. In the Nordic region, this has led to preparations for great power armed conflict in the region after a long period of strategic neglect. All three of the Nordic states examined here, Finland, Sweden and Norway, have adopted so called total defence policies. Total defence combines the armed forces and civil society in a comprehensive whole of society approach to security intended to deter an attack by making a target state a very challenging prospect for an aggressor. Finland retained a total defence policy after the Cold War, but has had to re-examine its utility for the contemporary threat environment. For Norway and Sweden, total defence means significant challenges reviving Cold War era planning in a very different security and societal context. This study examines current Nordic security concepts through the critical, elements of total defence policies: national resilience and territorial defence. It also addresses the role that alliances and partnerships play in contemporary Nordic total defence planning. An important question is the extent to which these total defence concepts effectively address the perceived political and military threat from Russia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Total defence involves the whole of society, including actors and organizations from all sectors.
“By definition, total defence involves 'the whole of society' (Wither, 2020), including a number of actors and organizations from all sectors.”
From Navigating Collaboration: Understanding Civil-Military Interactions in Swedish Total Defence From a Security Network Perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Wither, 2020
Civil-military collaboration is at the heart of the total defence concept.
“Collaborative civil-military interaction is thus at the heart of the total defence concept.”
From Navigating Collaboration: Understanding Civil-Military Interactions in Swedish Total Defence From a Security Network Perspective (2025) · cites this paper as Wither, 2020
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Victor Tillberg, L., Berndtsson, J., & Tillberg, P. (2025) · Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies · doi:10.31374/sjms.288 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
“What is psychological in psychological defence? Revisiting the Nordic total defence doctrines”
Pursiainen, C. (2026) · Defence Studies · doi:10.1080/14702436.2026.2664463
- Authors
- Wither, J. K.
- Affiliations
- George C. Marshall European Center for Security Studies (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Wither, James Kenneth
- Venue
- Defence Studies
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-01-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 61-81
- ISSN
- 1470-2436 (ISSN-L)
- 1743-9698
- OpenAlex
- W3003306277
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 24 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 30.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Defence Studies (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Defense, Military, and Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › European Politics and Security
- Keywords
- total defence, national resilience, territorial defense, civil-military cooperation, great power conflict, Russian threat, European security, Finland, Sweden, Norway, NATO, strategic alliances, Cold War legacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review