The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities
Abstract
Traditionally, supervisors work with students on an individual basis and postgraduate development programmes are run on site. However, with increasing numbers of part‐time and international students, supervisory relationships are likely to be conducted at a distance as students study alongside other commitments. Isolation can often be a key feature for many postgraduates, whether based in the same institution as the supervisor and more particularly for international students or those studying at a distance. It can also be an issue for their supervisors. However, in this age of electronic communication, interactions at a distance should be able to be at least as robust as many of those conducted face to face. More broadly, the international research community is something generally cited as the context for research work, supervision, study and publication more generally. Entry firstly into the university academic community, and then into the larger global research community can be enabled, we would argue, by the support of communities of practice from the outset of postgraduate students’ and supervisors’ interactions. In this context, considerable numbers of international postgraduates at Anglia Ruskin University (UK) and their supervisors are being effectively supported through three innovations which build institutionally related communities of practice: (1) Guardian supervisors work with the students on research development programmes, with accompanying meetings organised during and round programme workshops, which focus throughout on strategies of meta‐learning. Subsequently they support students’ work at a distance with emails, and webcam correspondence. (2) PhD students are empowered to develop mutual, critically focused support for each other’s work through the enhanced use of the cohort in the compulsory research development workshops and through ongoing discussion lists, self‐help groups and symposia. (3) Supervisors of international postgraduates are supported as a community of practice through the revision of online supervisory discussion and development. This paper is based on action research carried out with current and graduate students, guardian supervisors and supervisors as collaborators to explore the rationale, problems, practices and the richness of the experience of working with a system which fosters communities of practice, involving guardian supervisors, distance supervisors and postgraduate cohorts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry
Flavell, J. H. (1979) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.34.10.906 · Cited by 11,282 · cited 1×
“This, we believe, encourages student meta‐learning (Flavell, 1979 ; Biggs, 1991 ), i.”
Cited by
How are doctoral students supervised? Concepts of doctoral research supervision
Lee, A. (2008) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075070802049202 · Cited by 721
Sykes, T. A., Venkatesh, V., & Johnson, J. L. (2014) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.25300/misq/2014/38.1.03 · Cited by 210
“However, future studies that incorporate such data would be valuable as these sources of support (computermediated communications) enable the tracking of exchanges between employees, as well as the identification of resident experts (Wisker et al. 2007).”
BackgroundCowling, M., Crawford, J., Allen, K.-A., & Wehmeyer, M. (2023) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.8598 · Cited by 55
Robinson, C. (2018) · London Review of Education · doi:10.18546/lre.16.1.09 · Cited by 21
Metadata
- Authors
- Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M.
- Venue
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2007-08
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 301-320
- ISSN
- 1470-3297 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-3300
- OpenAlex
- W2003391277
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/14703290701486720
- The paper
- Wisker, G., Robinson, G., & Shacham, M. (2007). Postgraduate research success: communities of practice involving cohorts, guardian supervisors and online communities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701486720
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.