The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fit matters in the supervisory relationship: doctoral students and supervisors perceptions about the supervisory activities
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In turn, in these disciplines, supervision plays a key role in doctoral students' experiences (Deuchar, 2008;Pyhältö et al., 2015), as students need supervisors who have the knowledge to guide their particular projects (Parry, 2007).”
From Assessing the person or the project? How disciplinary ontological and epistemological assumptions shape doctoral admissions in elite UK institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Pyhältö et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Aberdeen, T. (2013) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73 · Cited by 3,250
AN INVESTIGATION OF GENDER AND OTHER VARIABLES ON TIME TO COMPLETION OF DOCTORAL DEGREES
Seagram, B. C., Gould, J., & Pyke, S. W. (1998) · Research in Higher Education · doi:10.1023/a:1018781118312 · Cited by 228
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 10.1080/13562517.2012.752728 · DOI
- Becher, T., & Trowler, P. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
- 10.28945/710 · DOI
- 10.1108/01443330310790444 · DOI
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1177/030631201031001005 · DOI
- 10.1080/13562510802193905 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/jhe.2005.0039 · DOI · Paper page
- Golde, C. M. (2010). Entering different worlds. Socialization into disciplinary communities. In S. K. Gardner & P. Mendoza (Eds.), On becoming a scholar. Socialization and development in doctoral education (pp. 79–95). Virginia, VA: Stylus, LLC.
- Holland, J. (1985). Making vocational choices: A theory of vocational personalities and work environments (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- 10.1080/03075070500249161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00313830500109535 · DOI
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9 · DOI
- 10.1080/03075070220119986c · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5430/ijhe.v1n2p136 · DOI
- 10.1080/13601440903106551 · DOI
- 10.28945/1745 · DOI
- Saari, S., & Moilanen, A. (2012). International evaluation of research and doctoral training at the University of Helsinki 2005–2010. Administrative Publications 81. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
- 10.1017/CBO9780511803932 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/713696139 · DOI
Cited by
A Preliminary Examination of Doctoral Student Retention Factors in Private Online Workspaces
(Cathy) Ames, C., Berman, R., & Casteel, A. (2018) · International Journal of Doctoral Studies · doi:10.28945/3958 · Cited by 52
Spanish and UK post-PhD researchers: writing perceptions, well-being and productivity
Castelló, M., McAlpine, L., & Pyhältö, K. (2017) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2017.1296412 · Cited by 48
Self-citationInouye, K., Robson, J., Anaiz, P. R., Baker, S., & Ilie, S. (2026) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-025-01438-8 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Pyhältö, K., Vekkaila, J., & Keskinen, J.
- Venue
- Innovations in Education and Teaching International
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-01-02
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4-16
- ISSN
- 1470-3297
- 1470-3300
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 2
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
