Cited by 63Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and DisordersVirus-based gene therapy research

Gene therapy for age-related macular degeneration

Moore, Nicholas A., Bracha, Peter, Hussain, Rehan M., Morral, Nuria, Ciulla, Thomas A.·2017·Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In neovascular age related macular degeneration (nAMD), gene therapy to chronically express anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) proteins could ameliorate the treatment burden of chronic intravitreal therapy and improve limited visual outcomes associated with 'real world' undertreatment. Areas covered: In this review, the authors assess the evolution of gene therapy for AMD. Adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors can transduce retinal pigment epithelium; one such early application was a phase I trial of AAV2-delivered pigment epithelium derived factor gene in advanced nAMD. Subsequently, gene therapy for AMD shifted to the investigation of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (sFLT-1), an endogenously expressed VEGF inhibitor, binding and neutralizing VEGF-A. After some disappointing results, research has centered on novel vectors, including optimized AAV2, AAV8 and lentivirus, as well as genes encoding other anti-angiogenic proteins, including ranibizumab, aflibercept, angiostatin and endostatin. Also, gene therapy targeting the complement system is being investigated for geographic atrophy due to non-neovascular AMD. Expert opinion: The success of gene therapy for AMD will depend on the selection of the most appropriate therapeutic protein and its level of chronic expression. Future investigations will center on optimizing vector, promoter and delivery methods, and evaluating the risks of the chronic expression of anti-angiogenic or anti-complement proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14712598.2017.1356817

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 80 · Cited by 63

Authors
Moore, N. A., Bracha, P., Hussain, R. M., Morral, N., & Ciulla, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Indiana University School of Medicine (US)
  • Department of Medical and Molecular Genetics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
  • Midwest Eye Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Ciulla, Thomas A.
Venue
Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy
Published
2017-07-20
Volume
17
Issue
10
Pages
1235-1244
ISSN
  • 1471-2598 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7682
OpenAlex
W2739373612
Cited by
63
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
Keywords
gene therapy, neovascular age-related macular degeneration, adeno-associated virus vectors, AAV2, AAV8, lentiviral vectors, soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1, pigment epithelium-derived factor, ranibizumab, aflibercept, angiostatin, endostatin, complement system, geographic atrophy, retinal pigment epithelium, anti-angiogenic proteins
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Genetic Therapy, RNA Interference, RNA, Small Interfering, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review