Cited by 53Public Policy and Administration ResearchPublic Administration and GovernancePolitical Theory and Democracy

A democratic public administration?: Developments in public participation and innovations in community governance

Brugué, Quim, Gallego, Raquel·2003·Public Management Review

Abstract

In political theory public administration does not appear as a defining element of democracy. Moreover, traditional public administration is by definition a non-democratic organization. This paper argues that the democratisation of public administration is both necessary and appropriate. It is necessary in order to overcome some of the theoretical and empirical limitations of the politics/administration dychotomy. It is appropriate because it allows us to tackle these limitations and the difficulties derived from it by helping improve the efficiency and effectiveness, as well as the institutional performance, of administrations. First, the paper addresses, from a conceptual perspective, the question of ‘Why democratise public administration?’. Second, it explores the mechanisms through which democratisation may be achieved both in public administration's internal and external relations – that is, ‘How can public administration be democratised?’. The conclusions point out some implications for traditional models of administrative efficiency and political responsiveness – that is, for democratic politics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1471903032000146973

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most cases studied feature a populist image of the state bureaucracy that is strictly traditional, hierarchical, and instrumental, one of absolute loyalty and obedience towards the government of the day.

    “Most cases studied feature a populist image of the state bureaucracy that is strictly traditional, hierarchical, and instrumental, one of absolute loyalty and obedience towards the government of the day, i.e., their own leadership (see Brugué & Gallego, 2003).”

    From Public Administration Under Populist Rule: Standing Up Against Democratic Backsliding (2024) · cites this paper as Brugué & Gallego, 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brugué, Q., & Gallego, R.
Venue
Public Management Review
Published
2003-09
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
425-447
ISSN
  • 1461-667X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-9037
  • 1471-9045
OpenAlex
W1555987152
Cited by
53
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Public Management Review (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Public Administration and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
Keywords
politics-administration dichotomy, democratic public administration, administrative efficiency, political responsiveness, institutional performance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review