Cited by 68Motor Control and AdaptationEmbodied and Extended CognitionVestibular and auditory disorders

Predictive and reactive finger force control during catching in cerebellar degeneration

Nowak, Dennis, Hermsdörfer, Joachim, Rost, Katrin, Timmann, Dagmar, Topka, Helge·2004·The Cerebellum

Abstract

We investigated how patients with cerebellar degeneration control fingertip forces to resist a perturbation imposed on a handheld load. Patients and healthy sex- and age-matched control subjects held an instrumented receptacle between the index finger and thumb. A weight was dropped into the receptacle either unexpectedly from the experimenter's hand with the subject being blindfolded or expectedly from the subject's opposite hand. This paradigm allowed us to study predictive and reactive modes of finger force control. Patients generated an overshoot of grip force, irrespective of whether the weight was dropped expectedly or unexpectedly. When the weight was dropped from the experimenter's hand, grip force lagged behind the load perturbation at impact in patients and controls. When the weight was dropped expectedly from the subject's opposite hand, healthy subjects started to increase grip force prior to the release of the weight. This observation is indicative for a predictive mode of force control. In contrast, the grip force profile of cerebellar patients was not processed in anticipation of the time of impact when the weight was dropped from the opposite hand. Our data suggest involvement of cerebellar circuits in a predictive, but less in a reactive, mode of fingertip force control during manipulative behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14734220410019057

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A wide range of previous studies converge to the cerebellum processes as the loci of internal forward models.

    “A wide range of previous studies converge to the cerebellum processes as the loci of internal forward models”

    From The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review (2020) · cites this paper as Nowak et al., 2004

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 68

Authors
Nowak, D., Hermsdörfer, J., Rost, K., Timmann, D., & Topka, H.
Affiliations
  • München Klinik Bogenhausen (DE)
  • University of Duisburg-Essen (DE)
Corresponding author
Nowak, Dennis
Venue
The Cerebellum
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
3
Issue
4
Pages
227-235
ISSN
1473-4222 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039179719
Cited by
68
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Cerebellum (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vestibular and auditory disorders
Keywords
cerebellar degeneration, grip force control, fingertip force control, catching, load disturbance, cerebellar circuits, manipulative behavior
MeSH terms
Acceleration, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Electromyography, Female, Fingers, Forecasting, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Spinocerebellar Degenerations, Weight-Bearing, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review