The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Partition of British India: Causes and Consequences Revisited
Abstract
The Punjab Bloodied, Partitioned and Cleansed: Unravelling the 1947 Tragedy Through Secret British Reports and First-Person Accounts. By Ishtiaq Ahmed. Karachi: Oxford University Press, 2012. xlvii...
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Roy, K.
- Affiliations
- Jadavpur University (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Roy, Kaushik
- ORCID
- Roy, Kaushik
- Venue
- India Review
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-01-02
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 78-86
- ISSN
- 1473-6489 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-3036
- OpenAlex
- W2058988853
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- India Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › South Asian Studies and Diaspora
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › South Asian Studies and Conflicts
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies
- Keywords
- Partition of India, Punjab, communal violence, Indian independence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
