Atezolizumab for the treatment of breast cancer
Abstract
Introduction: In March 2019, atezolizumab became the first immune checkpoint inhibitor to receive a breast cancer-specific approval. Based on a significant improvement in progression-free survival as well as a 10-month improvement in overall survival (on interim analysis) seen in the IMpassion 130 trial, the combination of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel was approved for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).Areas covered: This article reviews current data and ongoing research on atezolizumab for the treatment of breast cancer. Results of atezolizumab monotherapy trials in the context of other early immune checkpoint blockade trials in breast cancer are discussed as well as data from combination clinical trials with chemotherapy in both early-stage and metastatic breast cancer. We focus on the safety and efficacy analyses from the phase III IMpassion trial that led to FDA and EMA approval of atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in patients whose tumor tested positive for PD-L1 by the Ventana SP142 companion diagnostic immunohistochemical assay.Expert opinion: The FDA and EMA approvals of atezolizumab mark an important advance for treatment of metastatic TNBC. However, ongoing investigations need to define better biomarkers of response, determine resistance mechanisms, and identify strategies to increase response rates.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Triple-negative breast cancer in humans, marked by mesenchymal appearance, shows susceptibility to anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition.
“On the other hand, triple-negative breast cancer in humans, which are marked by the mesenchymal appearance of cancer cells, show susceptibility to anti-PD-L1 checkpoint inhibition147,148.”
From TGFβ biology in cancer progression and immunotherapy (2021) · cites this paper as [147]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 94
- Authors
- Reddy, S. M., Carroll, E., & Nanda, R.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
- University of Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Nanda, Rita
- Venue
- Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-02-27
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-158
- ISSN
- 1473-7140 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-8328
- OpenAlex
- W3007838533
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 5.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
- Keywords
- atezolizumab, triple-negative breast cancer, immune checkpoint inhibitors, PD-L1, nab-paclitaxel, metastatic breast cancer, locally advanced breast cancer, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry, treatment response biomarkers, drug resistance
- MeSH terms
- Progression-Free Survival, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, Animals, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Female, Humans, Neoplasm Staging, Survival Rate, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, Triple Negative Breast Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review