Cited by 227Impact of Technology on AdolescentsGambling Behavior and TreatmentsSexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Treatments of internet gaming disorder: a systematic review of the evidence

Open access
Zajac, Kristyn, Ginley, Meredith K., Chang, Rocio·2020·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Introduction: The American Psychiatric Association included Internet gaming disorder (IGD) in the 5th Edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, and the World Health Organization included gaming disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases. These recent updates suggest significant concern related to the harms of excessive gaming.Areas covered: This systematic review provides an updated summary of the scientific literature on treatments for IGD. Inclusion criteria were that studies: 1) evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for IGD or excessive gaming; 2) use an experimental design (i.e. multi-armed [randomized or nonrandomized] or pretest-posttest); 3) include at least 10 participants per group; and 4) include an outcome measure of IGD symptoms or gaming duration. The review identified 22 studies evaluating treatments for IGD: 8 evaluating medication, 7 evaluating cognitive behavioral psychotherapy, and 7 evaluating other interventions and psychosocial treatments.Expert opinion: Even with the recent uptick in publication of such clinical trials, methodological flaws prevent strong conclusions about the efficacy of any treatment for IGD. Additional well-designed clinical trials using common metrics for assessing IGD symptoms are needed to advance the field.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2020.1671824

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 47 · Cited by 227

Authors
Zajac, K., Ginley, M. K., & Chang, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Connecticut (US)
  • East Tennessee State University (US)
  • Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
Corresponding author
Zajac, Kristyn
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
85-93
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W2977096939
Cited by
227
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - East Tennessee State University (East Tennessee State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (K23DA034879, R21DA042900)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Keywords
internet gaming disorder, gaming disorder, treatment efficacy, cognitive behavioral therapy, pharmacotherapy, psychosocial interventions, excessive gaming, DSM-5, ICD-11
MeSH terms
Internet Addiction Disorder, Psychosocial Intervention, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Video Games

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review