Cited by 16Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeGlaucoma and retinal disorders

Retinal optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders and MOG-antibody associated disorders: an updated review

Lin, Ting-Yi, Chien, Claudia, Lu, Angelo, Paul, Friedemann, Zimmermann, Hanna G.·2021·Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics

Abstract

Introduction Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein IgG antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) comprise two groups of rare neuroinflammatory diseases that cause attack-related damage to the central nervous system (CNS). Clinical attacks are often characterized by optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, and to a lesser extent, brainstem encephalitis/area postrema syndrome. Retinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a non-invasive technique that allows for in vivo thickness quantification of the retinal layers. Apart from OCT, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an increasingly important role in NMOSD and MOGAD diagnosis based on the current international diagnostic criteria. Retinal OCT and brain/spinal cord/optic nerve MRI can help to distinguish NMOSD and MOGAD from other neuroinflammatory diseases, particularly from multiple sclerosis, and to monitor disease-associated CNS-damage. Areas covered This article summarizes the current status of imaging research in NMOSD and MOGAD, and reviews the clinical relevance of OCT, MRI and other relevant imaging techniques for differential diagnosis, screening and monitoring of the disease course. Expert opinion Retinal OCT and MRI can visualize and quantify CNS damage in vivo, improving our understanding of NMOSD and MOGAD pathology. Further efforts on the standardization of these imaging techniques are essential for implementation into clinical practice and as outcome parameters in cli…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737175.2021.1982697

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, T.-Y., Chien, C., Lu, A., Paul, F., & Zimmermann, H. G.
Affiliations
Max Delbrück Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Paul, Friedemann
Venue
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Published
2021-10-03
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
1101-1123
ISSN
  • 1473-7175 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8360
OpenAlex
W3201068924
Cited by
16
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Research Grant ‘CC-Neuro’ from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
Keywords
neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder, retinal optical coherence tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, area postrema syndrome, differential diagnosis from multiple sclerosis, retinal layer thickness, neuroinflammatory diseases
MeSH terms
Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Autoantibodies, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Neuromyelitis Optica, Tomography, Optical Coherence, Aquaporin 4, Myelin-Oligodendrocyte Glycoprotein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review