Safety and tolerability of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: unresolved and emerging issues
Abstract
Introduction Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are a mainstay of treatment options for type 2 diabetes. They contribute to lowering blood glucose levels, generally have a favorable tolerability profile, and can be used alone or in combination with other antidiabetic agents. Based on the duration of their effects, GLP-1 RAs can be divided into two classes: short-acting and long-acting. Differences exist between these sub-classes, and between each drug, in terms of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. Therefore, prescribers cannot necessarily assume GLP-1 RA 'class effects', especially in terms of tolerability. Areas covered: This article reviews the published data on the safety and tolerability of currently available GLP-1 RAs and, recognizing the importance of safety profiles when selecting the appropriate treatment for each patient, examines the clinical implications of the differences between the drugs in this class. Cardiovascular safety, gastrointestinal tolerability, and tolerability in elderly patients are discussed as specific areas of interest to prescribers selecting between GLP-1 RAs for their patients. Expert opinion: Although further research is needed, the current evidence offers the potential to tailor treatment more accurately to each patient. Ultimately, this may improve adherence and persistence, thereby improving glycemic control and, in turn, reducing the risk of macro- and micro-vascular complications.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Further enhancement of the efficacy of GLP-1R agonists alone is limited by dose-dependent gastrointestinal events.
“further enhancement of the efficacy of GLP-1R agonists alone is limited by dose-dependent gastrointestinal events [9,10]”
From Next generation GLP-1/GIP/glucagon triple agonists normalize body weight in obese mice (2022) · cites this paper as [10]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 24
- Authors
- Raccah, D.
- Affiliations
- Hôpital Sainte-Marguerite (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Raccah, Denis
- ORCID
- Raccah, Denis
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2016-12-11
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-10
- ISSN
- 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-764X
- OpenAlex
- W2560670991
- Cited by
- 24
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Sanofi (NA)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, drug safety, tolerability, cardiovascular safety, gastrointestinal tolerance, elderly patients, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, treatment selection, glycemic control
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Time Factors, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review