The risk of cardiovascular complications with current obesity drugs
Open accessAbstract
INTRODUCTION: Obesity is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Four medications are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for chronic weight management when used as an adjunct to a reduced-calorie diet and increased physical activity in adults. These medications result in clinically significant weight losses, as well as improvements in some cardiometabolic risk factors. AREAS COVERED: We briefly review the history of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) as related to cardiovascular safety, and summarize weight loss efficacy and cardiovascular data from clinical trials of orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, and liraglutide. EXPERT OPINION: Current AOMs approved for chronic weight management have generally favorable effects on some cardiometabolic parameters. However, the long-term safety of orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, and naltrexone/bupropion on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have not been established. The cardiovascular safety of liraglutide, at a dose of 1.8 mg/d, was demonstrated in a large randomized outcomes trial in participants with type 2 diabetes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The long-term safety of orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, and phentermine/topiramate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality has not been established.
“However, the long-term safety of orlistat, naltrexone/bupropion, and phentermine/topiramate on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality have not been established [114].”
From Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Anti-Obesity Treatment: Where Do We Stand? (2021) · cites this paper as [114]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 77 · Cited by 23
- Authors
- Chao, A. M., Wadden, T. A., Berkowitz, R. I., Quigley, K., & Silvestry, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chao, Ariana M.
- Venue
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-09-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1095-1104
- ISSN
- 1474-0338 (ISSN-L)
- 1744-764X
- PMC
- PMC7554173
- OpenAlex
- W3047299617
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 77
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (K23NR017209)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- anti-obesity drugs, cardiovascular safety, obesity, weight loss, orlistat, phentermine/topiramate, naltrexone/bupropion, liraglutide, cardiometabolic risk, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular morbidity and mortality
- MeSH terms
- Heart Disease Risk Factors, Animals, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diet, Reducing, Humans, Obesity, Weight Loss, Exercise, Anti-Obesity Agents
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review