The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Interdisciplinary project-based learning: an online wiki experience in teacher education
Abstract
In the current research study the use of Wikis as an online didactic tool to apply project-based learning in higher education was reported. The study was conducted in university teacher education programmes. During the online activities, participants developed interdisciplinary projects for the primary school working collaboratively in small groups in a Wiki virtual environment within the Moodle platform. Science was at the core of the projects and acted as an organising hub to finding links with other disciplines. A mixed-methods approach involving the collection of both quantitative and qualitative data was adopted in the current research study. The authors developed the following three instruments in order to measure both processes and outcomes of the online activities: the interdisciplinary project-based learning questionnaire, the reflection questionnaire and a rubric for assessing interdisciplinary projects. The current paper focuses only on the qualitative data, which were subjected to an inductive content analysis. Results provided evidence of the processes involved during the collaborative activities and that online activities can develop teachers’ abilities to design projects in interdisciplinary contexts. The discussion highlights the aspects of the online environment that made the collaborative work effective in learning. Future implications and suggestions for teacher education programmes are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“splitting the whole cohort into smaller groups (e.g., through breakout or chat rooms) for undertaking specific tasks (Biasutti and EL-Deghaidy 2014;Delfino and Persico 2007;Ducan and Barnett 2009;Nicholas and Ng 2009), and;”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Biasutti and EL-Deghaidy 2014
In the citing paper
“Effective practice relating to the use of pedagogical tools and technologies (e.g., gamification, animated clips, videos, wiki tools, podcasts, voice boards, virtual worlds, e-book readers, e-folio, MOOC) showed the need to use technologies that are appropriate for the task (Biasutti and EL-Deghaidy 2014;Cullen, Kullman, and Wild 2013).”
From COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices (2020) · cites this paper as Biasutti and EL-Deghaidy 2014
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- Anderson B., 2004, The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 5
- 10.1080/14759390200200133 · DOI
- 10.1080/1475939X.2010.513765 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.006 · DOI
- 10.1177/1029864912467634 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.009 · DOI
- Bruner J., 1990, Acts of meaning
- Corbin J., 2008, Basics of qualitative research
- 10.1007/s11412-007-9035-z · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.001 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203166093 · DOI
- 10.1080/08923640109527071 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/14759390903579133 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.04.004 · DOI
- Kearsley G., 1999, Educational Technology, 38, 20
- Krogstie B., 2006, Proceedings of the 2006 International Symposium on Wikis
- 10.1017/S0958344008000414 · DOI
- 10.1109/TE.2010.2044506 · DOI
- 10.1080/0305764X.2010.481256 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.010 · DOI
- O’Bannon B., 2010, Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, 2814
- 10.1080/1475939X.2012.755470 · DOI
- Parker J., 2007, Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3, 57
- 10.1080/1475939X.2013.778456 · DOI
- 10.1080/14759390500200196 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.10.007 · DOI
- Sonnenwald D. H., 1997, Information seeking in context, 179
- 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.10.021 · DOI
- 10.1080/1475939X.2010.491233 · DOI
- 10.1080/1475939X.2012.659885 · DOI
- 10.1080/09523980902933425 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
COVID-19 and teacher education: a literature review of online teaching and learning practices
Carrillo, C., & Flores, M. A. (2020) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2020.1821184 · Cited by 1,019
Metadata
- Authors
- Biasutti, M., & EL-Deghaidy, H.
- Affiliations
- University of Padua (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Biasutti, Michele
- ORCID
- Biasutti, Michele
- Venue
- Technology, Pedagogy and Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-04-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 339-355
- ISSN
- 0962-029X (ISSN-L)
- 1475-939X
- 1747-5139
- OpenAlex
- W1964389763
- Cited by
- 88
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6
- FWCI
- 30.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Technology Pedagogy and Education (publishedVersion)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Problem and Project Based Learning
- Social Sciences › Communication › Wikis in Education and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- interdisciplinary project-based learning, wikis, virtual learning environments, teacher professional development, Moodle, cooperative learning, primary school teachers, project design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review