CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 22Lower Extremity Biomechanics and PathologiesSports Dynamics and BiomechanicsSports Performance and Training

The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Concurrent validity of an easy-to-use inertial measurement unit-system to evaluate sagittal plane segment kinematics during overground sprinting at different speeds

Open access
de Ruiter, Cornelis J., Wilmes, Erik, Brouwers, Susan A.J., Jagers, Erik C., van Dieën, Jaap H.·2024·Sports Biomechanics
DOI 10.1080/14763141.2022.2056076
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study investigated concurrent validity of inertial measurement units (IMUs) and high-speed video for sagittal plane kinematics during overground sprinting. The practical relevance is demonstrated by reporting the changes in thigh kinematics in relation to toe-off and touch-down of the feet at near maximal to maximal (80–100%) speeds. Sixteen athletes ran multiple 60 m sprints with IMUs on their feet, shanks, thighs, pelvis and trunk. High-speed video data were captured of the start strides and of one complete stride at full speed. Coefficients of multiple correlation with video were >0.99 for angles and angular velocities of the thigh and shank but low for the pelvis and trunk (0.13–0.66). For the limb segment angles (minimum, maximum, at toe-off and at touch-down) absolute biases (limits of agreement) were ≤2.9°(≤7.7°) and for angular velocities the values were ≤57°.s−1(≤93°.s−1). Many of the expected speed-related changes in thigh kinematics were significant (linear mixed effect regression; p < 0.05).In conclusion, an easy-to-use IMU system has good concurrent validity with video, especially for the thigh. It registers the kinematics of all strides in multiple sprints and can detect relatively small changes thereof, including those at key moments of foot-touch-down and toe-off.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14763141.2022.2056076

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mann, R., & Murphy, A. (2018). The mechanics of sprinting and hurdling. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
de Ruiter, C. J., Wilmes, E., Brouwers, S. A. J., Jagers, E. C., & van Dieën, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
ORCID
Venue
Sports Biomechanics
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2022-03-30
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
2757-2770
ISSN
  • 1476-3141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1752-6116
DOI
10.1080/14763141.2022.2056076
OpenAlex
W4220913303
Cited by
22
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Sports Biomechanics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
no external funding or grants provided
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
Keywords
inertial measurement unit, concurrent validity, high-speed video, sprinting, sagittal plane kinematics, sprint speed, toe-off, stride analysis, wearable sensors
MeSH terms
Adult, Biomechanical Phenomena, Female, Foot, Humans, Male, Pelvis, Running, Thigh, Time and Motion Studies, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Lower Extremity, Young Adult, Torso, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review