Cited by 101Maternal and fetal healthcareBlood transfusion and managementPregnancy and preeclampsia studies

Placenta previa and maternal hemorrhagic morbidity

Open access
Gibbins, Karen J., Einerson, Brett D., Varner, Michael W., Silver, Robert M.·2018·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Placenta previa is associated with maternal hemorrhage, but most literature focuses on morbidity in the setting of placenta accreta. We aim to characterize maternal morbidity associated with previa and to define risk factors for hemorrhage. METHODS: This is a secondary cohort analysis of the NICHD Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network Cesarean Section Registry. This analysis included all women undergoing primary Cesarean delivery without placenta accreta. About 496 women with previa were compared with 24,201 women without previa. Primary outcome was composite maternal hemorrhagic morbidity. Non-hemorrhagic morbidities and risk factors for hemorrhage were also evaluated. RESULTS: Maternal hemorrhagic morbidity was more common in women with previa (19 versus 7%, aRR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5). Atony requiring uterotonics (aRR 3.1, 95% CI 2.0-4.9), red blood cell transfusion (aRR 3.8, 95% CI 2.5-5.7), and hysterectomy (aRR 5.1, 95% CI 1.5-17.3) were also more common with previa. For women with previa, factors associated with maternal hemorrhage were pre-delivery anemia, thrombocytopenia, diabetes, magnesium use, and general anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Placenta previa is an independent risk factor for maternal hemorrhagic morbidity. Some risk factors are modifiable, but many are intrinsic to the clinical scenario.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767058.2017.1289163

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Regional anaesthesia is considered safe and is associated with lower risks of haemorrhage than general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia or a low-lying placenta.

    “Regional anaesthesia is considered safe and is associated with lower risks of haemorrhage than general anaesthesia for caesarean delivery in women with placenta praevia or a low-lying placenta.”

    From Placenta Praevia and Placenta Accreta: Diagnosis and Management: Green‐top Guideline No. 27a (2019) · cites this paper as [86]

    The Results report that general anaesthesia was associated with greater maternal haemorrhagic morbidity among women having caesarean delivery for placenta praevia (aOR 4.29, 95% CI 2.25–8.16). The paper does not establish that regional anaesthesia is safe or report this association for women with a low-lying placenta. The Discussion also cautions that general anaesthesia may be a marker of emergency delivery rather than a cause of bleeding. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Maternal haemorrhagic morbidity is more common in women with praevia (19% versus 7%, adjusted RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5).

    “maternal haemorrhagic morbidity is more common in women with praevia (19% versus 7%, adjusted RR 2.6, 95% CI 1.9-3.5)”
  • The recent case-control study from the NICHD/MFMU Network Cesarean Section Registry found general anaesthesia to be one of the main factors associated with maternal haemorrhage in women with placenta praevia.

    “The recent case-control study from the NICHD/MFMU Network Cesarean Section Registry found general anaesthesia to be one of the main factors associated with maternal haemorrhage in women with placenta praevia.86”
  • Main factors associated with maternal haemorrhage in women with placenta praevia include pre-delivery anaemia, thrombocytopenia, diabetes and magnesium use.

    “the main factors associated with maternal haemorrhage include pre-delivery anaemia, thrombocytopenia, diabetes and magnesium use.86”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 20 · Cited by 101

Authors
Gibbins, K. J., Einerson, B. D., Varner, M. W., & Silver, R. M.
Affiliations
Intermountain Healthcare (US)
Corresponding author
Gibbins, Karen J.
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2017-02-21
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
494-499
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2584620814
Cited by
101
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (05)
  • Utah WRHR (16])
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (1K12HD085816)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Keywords
placenta previa, maternal hemorrhage, postpartum hemorrhage, cesarean section, uterine atony, red blood cell transfusion, hysterectomy, risk factors, thrombocytopenia, diabetes mellitus, general anesthesia
MeSH terms
Adult, Anemia, Cesarean Section, Female, Postpartum Hemorrhage, Humans, Magnesium, Placenta Previa, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Thrombocytopenia, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review