Cited by 13Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and fetal healthcarePreterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis

First trimester ultrasound prediction of velamentous cord insertions: A prospective study

Open access
Derisbourg, Sara, Boulay, Amélie, Lamy, Clotilde, Barlow, Patricia, Van Rysselberge, Michel, Thomas, Dominique, Rozenberg, Serge, Daelemans, Caroline·2021·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The marginal and velamentous cord insertions complicate around 8% of pregnancies and are at higher risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. Their visualisation seems to decrease with advancing gestational age. Our aim was to analyse whether an umbilical cord insertion in the lower third of the uterus during the first trimester could predict abnormal cord insertions later in pregnancy. METHODS: This was a prospective multicentre study in two hospitals. During the first trimester, the cord insertions were inspected as well as their location (lower third of the uterus or not). Finally, all cord insertions were described at delivery. RESULTS: = 192) a low cord insertion, and in 3.8% the insertion could not be situated. We find that 4.7% of those who have a low-lying cord insertion versus 0.7% in the normal cord insertion group during the first trimester will have a velamentous cord insertion subsequently (OR = 6.67; 95% CI = 2.67-16.63). CONCLUSION: The detection of a low lying umbilical cord insertion during the first-trimester ultrasound can help to predict an abnormal cord insertion at delivery particularly a velamentous cord insertion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767058.2019.1670797

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low cord insertion presented in approximately 12% of pregnancies, out of which 4.7% presented with velamentous cord insertion compared to the normal ones (OR: 6.67; 95% CI: 2.67-16.63).

    “Data from a prospective study showed that low cord insertion presented in approximately 12% of pregnancies, out of which 4.7% presented with velamentous cord insertion compared to the normal ones (OR: 6.67; 95% CI: 2.67–16.63) [63].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Derisbourg, S., Boulay, A., Lamy, C., Barlow, P., Van Rysselberge, M., Thomas, D., Rozenberg, S., & Daelemans, C.
Affiliations
  • Centre hospitalier Etterbeek-Ixelles (BE)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Pierre (BE)
  • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Universitaire Saint Pierre, Bruxelles, Belgium
Corresponding author
Derisbourg, Sara
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2019-09-26
Volume
34
Issue
16
Pages
2642-2648
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W2976525923
Cited by
13
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dépôt institutionnel de l'Université libre de Bruxelles (Université Libre de Bruxelles) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Bourse Iris Recherche (2012-8 20690)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Preterm Birth and Chorioamnionitis
Keywords
velamentous cord insertion, marginal cord insertion, first-trimester ultrasound, prenatal prediction, perinatal outcomes
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Placenta, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Prospective Studies, Umbilical Cord, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Vasa Previa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review