Cited by 46Prenatal Substance Exposure EffectsCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

The impact of state legalization on rates of marijuana use in pregnancy in a universal drug screening population

Lee, Emily, Pluym, Ilina D., Wong, Deanna, Kwan, Lorna, Varma, Vanita, Rao, Rashmi·2022·The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of state legalization of rate on marijuana use in pregnancy in a population with universal drug screening.Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study from July 2016 to December 2018 of pregnant women who had universal drug screening of marijuana use before and after legalization of recreational marijuana in California on 1 January 2018. Maternal medical conditions and neonatal outcomes associated with usage were also evaluated. Student’s t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and multiple linear regression were used for statistical analyses.Results: Of 466 women, initial marijuana usage in pregnancy confirmed by urine drug test increased after legalization from 6 to 11% (p = .05). Factors associated with marijuana usage included younger age, white or black race, single marital status, psychiatric disorders, intimate partner violence and concomitant tobacco and alcohol use. 73% of users in this study had cessation of marijuana use with subsequent negative UDT. There was no statistical difference in rates of preterm birth, small for gestational age, NICU admission, or Apgar scores, when adjusted for other risk factors. Conclusion: Rates of marijuana usage in pregnant women who underwent universal drug screening increased after legalization. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes between users and non-users.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14767058.2020.1765157

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Overall, studies examining cannabis use behavior revealed evidence for cannabis use increases following RCL, particularly for young adults (100%), peri-natal users (66%), and certain clinical populations (66%).

    “Overall, studies examining cannabis use behavior revealed evidence for cannabis use increases following RCL, particularly for young adults (100%), peri-natal users (66%), and certain clinical populations (66%).47,54,59”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lee, E., Pluym, I. D., Wong, D., Kwan, L., Varma, V., & Rao, R.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Lee, Emily
Venue
The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Published
2020-05-18
Volume
35
Issue
9
Pages
1660-1667
ISSN
  • 1476-4954 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-7058
OpenAlex
W3026563472
Cited by
46
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
marijuana use in pregnancy, recreational cannabis legalization, state legalization, urine drug testing, neonatal outcomes, preterm birth, small for gestational age, neonatal intensive care admission, Apgar score, maternal mental illness, intimate partner violence, alcohol and tobacco use, California
MeSH terms
Marijuana Use, Drug Evaluation, Preclinical, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Marijuana Smoking, Pregnancy, Retrospective Studies, Premature Birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review