The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Taking a critical stance toward internationalization ideologies in higher education: idealism, instrumentalism and educationalism
Abstract
This article suggests that difficulties in the implementation of internationalization policies in higher education can be explained by the fact that universities are guided by divergent understandings of the term ‘internationalization’ as well as by diverging or even contradictory ideologies. This text, therefore, critically singles out and investigates three internationalization ideologies, referred to as idealism, instrumentalism and educationalism with a special emphasis on their explicit as well as implicit visions, foci, goals and strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On being included: racism and diversity in institutional life
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-2895 · Cited by 1,369
The Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions: A Critical Review and a Radical Proposal
Hawawini, G. (2011) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.1954697 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Stier *, J.
- Venue
- Globalisation, Societies and Education
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-28
- ISSN
- 1476-7724 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-7732
- OpenAlex
- W1967674965
- Cited by
- 241
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Taking a critical stance toward internationalization ideologies in higher education: idealism, instrumentalism and educationalism. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1080/1476772042000177069
- The paper
- Stier *, J. (2004). Taking a critical stance toward internationalization ideologies in higher education: idealism, instrumentalism and educationalism. Globalisation, Societies and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1476772042000177069
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
