Cited by 38Diabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

A longitudinal study of coping, anxiety and glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes

Sultan, Serge, Epel, Elissa, Sachon, Claude, Vaillant, Genevieve, Hartemann-Heurtier, Agnes·2008·Psychology & Health

Abstract

Diabetes is a unique disorder in how much it requires a high degree of individual self management strategies. Anxiety and stress can affect glycemic control, and thus management of emotions may be key to good glycemic control. This study is the first to examine how anxiety and coping style, and their interaction, can affect long-term glycemic control. We measured anxiety, coping, and HbA1C, a measure for mean blood glucose levels in the previous 6-8 weeks, in 115 patients with Type 1 diabetes at baseline and roughly 5 years later. We found that coping predicted outcomes, especially for those high in trait anxiety. Trait anxiety predicted limited increases in HbA1C (mean increase = 0.02%). Lower levels of emotion-oriented coping predicted clinically significant increases in HbA1C, but only for those high on baseline trait anxiety (mean increase = 0.92%). Task-oriented coping predicted decreases in state anxiety. Use of task- and emotion-oriented coping appears especially important for highly anxious patients, both for emotional regulation and glycemic control. So, coping styles, basal anxiety and their interactions should be considered in designing follow-up and interventions with diabetic patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14768320701205218

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sultan, S., Epel, E., Sachon, C., Vaillant, G., & Hartemann-Heurtier, A.
Affiliations
  • Université Paris Descartes (FR)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR)
  • CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR)
  • c Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital , Paris, France
Corresponding author
Sultan, Serge
Venue
Psychology & Health
Published
2007-12-14
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
73-89
ISSN
  • 0887-0446 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-8321
OpenAlex
W1965595889
Cited by
38
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychology and Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, coping styles, trait anxiety, state anxiety, glycemic control, HbA1c, emotion-focused coping, task-oriented coping, emotion regulation, diabetes self-management, longitudinal outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Anxiety, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Biomarkers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review