Cited by 91Phonetics and Phonology ResearchLanguage Development and DisordersNeurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

Are bilinguals different? What VOT tells us about simultaneous bilinguals.

MacLeod, Andrea AN, Stoel-Gammon, Carol·2005·Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders

Abstract

The evidence for native-like phonological competence in the two languages spoken by simultaneous bilinguals is investigated by measuring their Voice Onset Time (VOT) of stop consonants in Canadian English (CE) and Canadian French (CF). Past research has suggested a correspondence between age of exposure to the second language and native-like production of VOT. This study addresses two questions: (1) do these simultaneous bilinguals maintain monolingual-like phonological contrasts of the stop consonants? and (2) do these speakers produce monolingual-like variation in the VOT values? Three groups of speakers are compared to investigate these questions: simultaneous bilinguals, monolingual CE, and monolingual CF. The bilingual participants produced monolingual-like phonemic contrasts and phonetic variation for all but the English voiced stops. It is proposed that bilinguals strive to maintain acceptable language-specific distinctions while simultaneously reducing the processing load by producing overlap in some contrasts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14769670500066313

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fact that not only late L2 learners but early bilinguals and bilinguals-from-birth exhibit differences from monolingual-likeness is plausibly explained under a bilingualism effects account.

    “Moreover, the fact that it is not only late L2 learners who exhibit such differences, but early bilinguals and bilinguals-from-birth as well, is plausibly explained under a bilingualism effects account (e.g., MacLeod and Stoel-Gammon, 2005; Fowler et al., 2008; Ortega, 2009).”

    From Plasticity, Variability and Age in Second Language Acquisition and Bilingualism (2018) · cites this paper as MacLeod and Stoel-Gammon, 2005

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 20 · Cited by 91

Authors
MacLeod, A. A., & Stoel-Gammon, C.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
MacLeod, Andrea AN
Venue
Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders
Published
2005-07
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
118-127
ISSN
  • 1476-9670 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-9689
OpenAlex
W2112119829
Cited by
91
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 35 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Multilingual Communication Disorders (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Keywords
simultaneous bilingualism, voice onset time, stop consonants, phonological contrasts, phonemic contrasts, phonetic variation, Canadian English, Canadian French, bilingual phonology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review