Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 4Indigenous Cultures and HistoryIndigenous Peoples' Rights and LawRace, History, and American Society

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

‘Defenders and Dissidents: Cooks Landing and the Fight to Define Tribal Sovereignty in the Red Power Era’

Fisher, Andrew H.·2020·Comparative American Studies An International Journal

Abstract

The 'Fish Wars' in the Pacific Northwest during the 1960s and 1970s hold an important yet predictable place within the historiography of the Red Power movement. In standard works, the fish-ins and other protests serve as a prelude to the larger pan-Indian struggle that seized public attention after the occupation of Alcatraz. The fight for treaty fishing rights thus serves as a proving ground for individuals like Hank Adams and organizations like the National Indian Youth Council, thereby shifting our attention from long-running issues and local actors to the events and figures that defined Red Power nationally and internationally. Moreover, historians generally have emphasized the Salish Sea (Puget Sound) region and the conflict among state, federal, and tribal governments rather than contemporaneous debates within and between Native nations. This study highlights several significant but slighted points regarding the Northwest fishing rights controversy. Focusing on Treaty Indians of the Columbia and their resistance to tribal regulation, my analysis illustrates that treaty rights could divide as well as unite Indians on multiple levels; that specific tribal struggles preceded the national pan-Indian movement and proceeded alongside; and that the Fish Wars were a crucial period in the history of tribal state-building.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14775700.2020.1724017

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Alexander, L., to Mr. Tollefson. 1966b [October 7]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Dept. of Interior,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  2. Columbia River General Council Fish Commission of the Yakima Indian Nation. 1966b [December 5]. Re: Yakima Indian Tribal Government & Yakima General Council Resolution T-38-56 (Umtuch), Box 46, Folder “Yakima Corr. – Dept. of Interior,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  3. Coniff, L., to Robert S. Robison. 1966 [December 12]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Dept. of Interior,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  4. Dawson, H., Jr. 1972.Little White Salmon Indian Settlement. Film. Directed by Harry Dawson. Portland, OR: Community Eye Design Workshop.
  5. Dysart, G. D., to Area Director, Bureau of Indian Affairs. 1964 [21 August]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Dept. of Interior,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  6. Executive Order of the General Council of the Yakima Indian Nation. 1966 [7 March]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Dept. of Interior/BIA Opinion on Fishing, 1966–69,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  7. Frederick, A. M., to Thor Tollefson, 1966 [27 April]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Dept. of Interior,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  8. Hobbs C. A., 1969, The George Washington Law Review, 37
  9. Jensen, H. M., to Area Director, Portland Area Office. 1966 [July 15]. Box 21- 94-0042,Vol. 2-3028585, #12David Sohappy, et. al. v. Donald Hodel- Civil #86-715, U.S. District Court – Eastern District of Washington Southern Division – Yakima Civil Case Files, 1938–1967, Record Group 21, National Archives and Records Administration-Pacific Alaska Region, Seattle, WA.
  10. Josephson, R. W., to George C. Starlund, 1963 [2 August]. Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Attorney General on Fishing rights – Catch & Escapement, 1961–63,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.
  11. Nesper L., 2007, Beyond Red Power: American Indian Politics and Activism since 1900
  12. Orr R. I., 2017, Reservation Politics: Historical Trauma, Economic Development, and Intratribal Conflict
  13. Starlund, G. C., to George D. Dysart. 1963 [10 August]. Box 46, Folder “Yakima, Corr. – Attorney General on Fishing rights – Catch & Escapement, 1961–63,” Records of the Washington State Department of Fisheries, Olympia, WA.

Metadata

Authors
Fisher, A. H.
Affiliations
William & Mary (US)
Corresponding author
Fisher, Andrew H.
Venue
Comparative American Studies An International Journal
Published
2020-02-06
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
117-141
ISSN
  • 1477-5700 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-2676
OpenAlex
W3004664267
Cited by
4
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative American Studies An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Indigenous Cultures and History
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
Red Power movement, tribal sovereignty, Native American protest, Salish Sea, Pacific Northwest

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review