Knowledge management in higher education: A literature review and further research avenues
Abstract
Despite the growing interest in knowledge management (KM) for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs), research on this topic is still fragmented and loosely focused. This paper adds to this research by providing a state-of-the-art of the current literature and outlining overlooked areas of investigation in order to address further studies towards bridging this gap. To this purpose, through a systematic review process, 121 articles have been coded and analysed according to distinct dimensions. Findings reveal that, despite the growing trend of papers on the topic, research on KM in HEIs is still in its embryonic stage with high levels of heterogeneity and lack of wider theoretical constructs. Furthermore, a thematic analysis highlights six main research concepts, from which this paper derives a comprehensive framework integrating the key issues from the literature and suggesting new possible research avenues in the field.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous studies link knowledge-centred leadership with more grounded approaches to adopting new technologies.
“These findings echo previous studies [6,28,31,55], which link knowledge-centred leadership with more grounded approaches to adopting new technologies.”
Cites
Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education
Bearman, M., & Dawson, P. (2013) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12092 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Oncioiu, I., & Bularca, A. R. (2025) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc15060144 · Cited by 64 · see citing works
- Authors
- Quarchioni, S., Paternostro, S., & Trovarelli, F.
- Affiliations
- University of Palermo (IT)
- Libera Università Maria SS. Assunta (IT)
- University of Siena (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Paternostro, Sergio
- Venue
- Knowledge Management Research & Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2020-03-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 304-319
- ISSN
- 1477-8238 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-8246
- OpenAlex
- W3009097073
- Cited by
- 131
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 24.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Knowledge Management Research & Practice (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Knowledge Management in Higher Education
- Social Sciences › Communication › Knowledge Management and Sharing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Architecture and Usability
- Keywords
- knowledge management, higher education institutions, research gaps, research framework, knowledge management in higher education, theoretical constructs
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review